Led On Line
Presentazione - About us
Novita' - What's new
E-Journals
E-books
Lededizioni Home Page Ricerca - Search
Catalogo - Catalogue
Per contattarci - Contacts
Per gli Autori - For the Authors
Statistiche - Statistics
Cookie Policy
Privacy Policy

Politiques éditoriales

Énoncé de mission

Ponti/Ponts est une revue en libre accès révisée par des pairs, qui se veut un haut lieu de rendez-vous des cultures francophones: du Québec et du Canada à l’Afrique subsaharienne, de la Belgique aux Caraïbes, du Maghreb à la Suisse et au Val d’Aoste, aux autres îles francophones dispersées partout dans le monde, toute la francophonie est conviée à cette rencontre, qui en est une de connaissance, de reconnaissance, de confrontation.

Chaque numéro de la revue, qui paraît une fois par an, présente des études critiques, des textes de création et un vaste répertoire de notes de lecture concernant les œuvres linguistiques, littéraires, culturelles des différents espaces francophones. Les essais critiques et les textes de création sont réunis dans un dossier thématique, qui peut inclure aussi des études linguistiques; celles-ci peuvent porter même sur des sujets libres.

 

Politiques de rubriques

Études linguistiques

Coché Soumissions actives Coché Indexé Coché Évalué par les pairs

Inédits

Coché Soumissions actives Coché Indexé Coché Évalué par les pairs

Notes de lecture

Décoché Soumissions actives Coché Indexé Décoché Évalué par les pairs
 

Périodicité

Ponti/Ponts paraît une fois l'an

 

Processus d'évaluation par les pairs

Ponti/Ponts est une revue en libre accès révisée par des pairs. 
La revue reçoit des articles inédits rédigés en français, d'auteurs invités et d'auteurs qui, de leur propre initiative, soumettent des travaux pour évaluation. 

Pour chaque appel à contribution le Comité scientifique de Ponti/Ponts sollicite des propositions de contribution (un titre et un résumé d’une quinzaine de lignes) rédigées en français.
Si la proposition est jugée inappropriée, elle est rejetée.
Les candidats retenus seront avisés rapidement et invités à soumettre leurs articles, s'il ont pas encore fait. Ceux-ci seront acheminés, en version anonyme, à des rapporteurs pour une évaluation des qualités et des lacunes du travail. Le comité scientifique prend ensuite connaissance des évaluations et décide de publier ou de ne pas publier l’article. Un avis synthétique et motivé peut être transmis aux auteurs des articles acceptés, qui mettent en œuvre les recommandations éventuelles du comité dans le délai accordé.

 

Politique de libre accès

Cette revue fournit le libre accès immédiat à son contenu, se basant sur le principe que la mise à disposition gratuite des travaux de recherche facilite un plus grand échange du savoir, à l'échelle de la planète.


 

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

Ponti / Ponts expects all parties involved in the act of publishing commit to these publication ethics. Our Editorial Board will remove any work that does not meet these standards. Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Authors of Ponti/Ponts must undertake the following responsibilities

  • Originality and Plagiarism: The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
  • Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication: An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
  • Acknowledgement of Sources: Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
  • Authorship of the Paper: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
  • Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
  • Fundamental errors in published works: When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Reviewers of Ponti/Ponts must undertake the following responsibilities

  • Contribution to Editorial Decisions: Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
  • Promptness: Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
  • Confidentiality: Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
  • Standards of Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  • Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  • Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Editors of of Ponti/Ponts must undertake the following responsibilities

  • Fair play: An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
  • Confidentiality: The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
  • Disclosure and conflicts of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.