Led On Line
Presentazione - About us
Novita' - What's new
Lededizioni Home Page Ricerca - Search
Catalogo - Catalogue
Per contattarci - Contacts
Per gli Autori - For the Authors
Statistiche - Statistics
Cookie Policy
Privacy Policy

Procedural Justice and the Discursive Construction of Narratives at Trial

Janet Ainsworth


The structure and practices of justice systems in many parts of the world are undergoing what can be seen as a kind of revolution – and one not merely of professional interest to lawyers and judges. What we are seeing in nation after nation is a move from inquisitorial models of legal adjudication toward adversarial models. The discourses of adjudication in these contrasting types of trials are changing the ways in which lawyers, judges, and witnesses come to see their role in the process. The change has implications that extend far beyond the courtrooms in which trials play out, however. Because the shift from inquisitorial to adversarial justice models determines how legal narratives are created and deployed in trials, this change has the potential to impact popular perceptions of legal legitimacy, which in turn has implications for the relationship of citizens to their government and justice systems. This article will detail the global character of this change in the nature of the discourse used in legal adjudication and will explore its potential ramifications for legal professionals and for society more generally.


adversarial justice; inquisitorial justice; procedural justice; legal narratives; witness examination

Full Text:



Bischoff, James L. 2003. “Reforming the Criminal Procedure System in Latin America.” Texas Hispanic Journal of Law and Policy 9, 27-55.

Block, Michael K. 2000. “An Experimental Comparison of Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Procedural Regimes.” American Law and Economics Review 2, 170-193.

Bradley, Craig M. 1996. “The Convergence of the Continental and the Common Law Models of Criminal Procedure.” Criminal Law Forum 7, 471-484.

Brants, Chrisje. 2012. “Wrongful Convictions and Inquisitorial Process: The Case of the Netherlands.” University of Cincinnati Law Review 80, 1069-1124.

Damaska, Mirjan. 1997. “The Uncertain Fate of Evidentiary Transplants: Anglo-American and Continental European Experiments.” American Journal of Comparative Law 45, 839-852.

Da Silva, R.A.T.C. 2009. The Brazilian Criminal Procedure: An Adversarial System Chained to an Inquisitorial Tradition. L.L.M. thesis, Harvard Law School.

Del Duca, Patrick. 2011. “Rule of Law and the Contribution of Lawyers to Deepening Latin American Financial Models.” Southwest Journal of International Law 18, 125-136.

Feeley, Malcolm and Setsuo Miyazawa. 2002. The Japanese Adversary System in Context. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Froeb, Luke M. and Bruce H. Kobayashi. 2012. “Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice.” In Procedural Law and Economics, edited by Chris William Sanchirico, 1-18. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Goffman, Erving. 1955. “On Face-work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18, 213-231.

Grande, Elisabetta. 2000. “Italian Criminal Justice: Borrowing and Resistance.” American Journal of Comparative Law 48, 227-259.

Hammergren, Linn. 2007. Envisioning Reform: Improving Judicial Efficiency in Latin America. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Hendrix, Steven E. 1998. “Innovation in Criminal Procedure in Latin America: Guatemala’s Conversion to the Adversarial System. Southwest Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas, 5, 365-405.

Illuminati, Giulio. 2005. “The Frustrated Turn to Adversarial Procedure in Italy.” Washington University Global Studies Law Review 4, 567-582.

Jeans, James W. 1999. Trial Advocacy. Minneapolis: West Publishing.

Johnson, Thea. 2013. “Latin Justice: A New Look.” World Policy Journal 30, 57-71.

Lancaster, Robert and Xiangshun Ding. 2006. “Addressing The Emergence of Advocacy in the Chinese Criminal Justice System.” Fordham International Law Journal 30, 356-410.

Langer, Máximo. 2007. “Revolution in the Latin American Criminal Process: Diffusion from the Periphery.” American Journal of Comparative Law 55, 617-676.

Lewis, Margaret K. 2009. “Taiwan’s New Adversarial System and the Overlooked Challenge of Efficiency-driven Reforms.” Virginia Journal of International Law 49, 652-726.

Li, Liying and Yue Ma. 2010. “Adjudication and Legal Reforms in Contemporary China.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 26, 36-52.

Li, Rong-geng. 2015. “From an Inquisitorial to an Adversarial System: The Recent Development in Criminal Justice of Taiwan.” In The Functional Transformation of Courts: Taiwan and Korea in Comparison, edited by Jiunn-rong Yeh, 239-266. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.

MacCoun, Robert J. 2005. “Voice, Control, and Belonging: The Double-edged Sword of Procedural Fairness.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1, 171-201.

Mack, Raneta Lawson. 2012. “Reestablishing Jury Trials in Japan: Foundational Lessons from the Russian Experience.” Creighton International and Comparative Law Journal 2, 100-115.

Mauet, Thomas A. 2007. Trial Techniques. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.

McComas, James H. 2011. Dynamic Cross Examination. Portland, OR: Trial Guides.

McConnell, Moira. 2011. Criminal Justice in China: An Empirical Inquiry. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Ming, Hu and Mengyan Dai. 2014. “Confidence in the Criminal Justice System: Differences between Citizens and Criminal Justice Officials in China.” Criminology and Criminal Justice 14, 502-524.

Nakao, Keisuke and Masatoshi Tsumagari. 2012. “Pseudo-adversarialism: A Theoretical Comparison between the US and Japanese Criminal Procedures.” The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 12, 1-44.

O’Barr, William M. and John M. Conley. 1985. “Litigant Satisfaction versus Legal Adequacy in Small Claims Court Narratives.” Law and Society Review 19, 661-702.

Ogg, James Thomas. 2012. “Italian Criminal Trials: Lost in Transition?: Differing Degrees of Criminal Justice Convergence in Italy and Australia.” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 36, 229-264.

Ogg, James Thomas. 2013. “Adversary and Adversity: Converging Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems of Justice: A Case Study of the Italian Criminal Trial Reforms.” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 37, 31-59.

Panzavolta, Michele. 2005. “Reforms and Counter-reforms in the Italian Struggle for an Accusatorial Criminal Law System.” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 30, 577-624.

Park, Roger C. 2003. “Adversarial Influence on the Interrogation of Trial Witnesses.” In Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice, edited by Peter J. van Koppen and Steven D. Penrod, 131-166. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Peerenboom, Randall. 2006. “What Have We Learned about Law and Development?: Describing, Predicting, and Assessing Legal Reforms in China.” Michigan Journal of International Law 27, 823-871.

Pulecio-Boek, Daniel. 2014. “The Geneology of Prosecutorial Discretion in Latin America: A Comparative and Historical Analysis of the Adversarial Reforms in the Region.” Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business 13, 65-145.

Roclawska, Monika and Adam Bulut. 2014. “Toward an American Model of Criminal Process: The Reform of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure.” Baltic Journal of Law and Politics 7, 1-11.

Sevier, Justin. 2014. “The Truth-Justice Tradeoff: Perceptions of Decisional Accuracy and Procedural Justice in Adversarial and Inquisitorial Legal Systems.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 20, 212-224.

Slobogin, Christopher. 2014. “Lessons from Inquisitorialism.” Southern California Law Review 87, 699-742.

Solum, Lawrence B. 2004. “Procedural justice.” University of San Diego Law and Economics Research Paper 04-02.

Swedish Arbitration Association website. 2016. http://swedisharbitration.se/about-arbitration-in-sweden/

Thaman, Stephen C. 2008. “Jury Trial and Adversary Procedure in Russia: Reform of Soviet Inquisitorial Procedure or Democratic Window-dressing?” In Russia and Its Constitution: Promise and Political Reality, edited by Gordon B. Smith and Robert S. Sharlet, 141-180. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.

Thibaut, John and Laurens Walker. 1978. “A Theory of Procedure.” California Law Review 1978, 541-566.

Tiede, Lydia Brashear. 2008. “Chile's Experiment in Criminal Law Reform: Conversion from an Inquisitorial to Adversarial System.”

Midwestern Political Science Association, 2008 Annual Meeting Conference Papers.

Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Van Cleave, Rachel A. 1997. “Italy Changed to Adversarial Criminal Model.” Emory International Law Review 11, 419-469.

van Koppen, Peter J. and Steven D. Penrod. 2003. Adversarial or Inquisitorial: Comparing Systems. In Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice, edited by Peter J. van Koppen and Steven D. Penrod, 1-19. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Ronzoni, Raúl. 2008. Reforma al Sistema Penal y Carcelario en Uruguay. Montevideo: Fundación CADAL (Centro para la Apertura y el Desarrollo de América Latina).

Wang, Tay-sheng. 2002. “The Legal Development of Taiwan in the 20th century: Toward a Liberal and Democratic Country.” Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 11, 531-560.

Watts, Michelle and Kimberly Dannels Ruff. 2012. “Drugs, Thugs, and the Diablos Rojos: Perils and Progress in Panama.” Latin American Policy 3, 208-234.

Wright, Ronald F. 2010. “Mexican Drug Violence and Adversarial Experiments.” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 35, 363-389.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/lcm-2017-001-ains


Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (27/11/2013 n. 380)
Online ISSN 2421-0293 - Print ISSN 2284-1881

Dipartimento di Scienze della Mediazione Linguistica e di Studi Interculturali
Università degli Studi di Milano

Editors-in-Chief: Paola Catenaccio (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Giuliana Garzone (IULM, Milano)
Editorial Board: Marina Brambilla (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Maria Vittoria Calvi (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Gabriella Cartago (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Lidia Anna De Michelis (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Giovanni Garofalo (Università degli Studi di Bergamo) - Dino Gavinelli (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Antonella Ghersetti (Università di Venezia Ca’ Foscari) - Maria Grazia Guido (Università del Salento) - Elena Liverani (IULM, Milano) - Stefania Maci (Università degli Studi di Bergamo) - Andrea Maurizi (Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca) - Chiara Molinari (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Stefano Ondelli (Università degli Studi di Trieste) - Davide Papotti (Università degli Studi di Parma) - Francesca Santulli (Università di Venezia Ca’ Foscari) - Girolamo Tessuto (Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli) - Giovanni Turchetta (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Stefano Vicari (Università degli Studi di Genova)
International Scientific Committee: James Archibald (McGill University, Montreal) - Natalija G. Bragina (Institut Russkogo Jazyka im. A.S. Puškina; RSUH, Mosca) - Kristen Brustad (University of Texas at Austin) - Luciano Curreri (University of Liège) - Hugo de Burgh (University of Westminster) - Giuditta Caliendo (Université de Lille) - Giorgio Fabio Colombo (Nagoya University Graduate School of Law) - Daniel Dejica (Universitatea Politehnica Timisoara) - Anna De Fina (Georgetown University, USA) - Claudio Di Meola, (Sapienza Università di Roma) - Denis Ferraris (Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris) - Lawrence Grossberg (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) - Stephen Gundle (University of Warwick) - Décio de Alencar Guzmán (Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém,  Brasile) - Matthias Heinz (Universität Salzburg) - Rosina Márquez-Reiter (The Open University) - Samir Marzouki (Université de Manouba à Tunis) - (John McLeod, University of Leeds) - Estrella Montolío Durán (Universitat de Barcelona) - M'bare N'gom (Morgan State University, Baltimore) - Christiane Nord (Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences) - Daragh O'Connell (Cork University) - Roberto Perin (York University, Toronto) - Giovanni Rovere (Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) - Lara Ryazanova-Clarke (University of Edinburgh) - Françoise Sabban (École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris) - Kirk St.Amant (Louisiana Tech University, University of Limerick/University of Strasbourg) - Paul Sambre (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven) - Srikant Sarangi (Aalborg University) - Junji Tsuchiya (Waseda University, Tokyo) - Xu Shi (Zhejiang University)
Section editors: Maria Matilde Benzoni, Università degli Studi di Milano (Modern history) - Paola Cotta Ramusino, Università degli Studi di Milano (Russian linguistics and translation) - Mario de Benedittis, Università degli Studi di Milano (Sociology) - Kim Grego Università degli Studi di Milano (English linguistics and translation) - Giovanna Mapelli, Università degli Studi di Milano (Spanish linguistics and translation) - Bettina Mottura, University of Milan (Chinese studies) - Mauro Giacomo Novelli, Università degli Studi di Milano (Contemporary Italian literature and culture) - Letizia Osti, Università degli Studi di Milano (Arab studies) - Maria Cristina Paganoni, Università degli Studi di Milano (English linguistics and translation) - Giuseppe Sergio, Università degli Studi di Milano (Italian linguistics) - Virginia Sica, Università degli Studi di Milano (Japanese studies)

Editor of LCM - The Series: Marie-Christine Jullion

Referee List