Led On Line
Presentazione - About us
Novita' - What's new
E-Journals
E-books
Lededizioni Home Page Ricerca - Search
Catalogo - Catalogue
Per contattarci - Contacts
Per gli Autori - For the Authors
Statistiche - Statistics
Cookie Policy
Privacy Policy

Comparing Chinese and EU Soft Power: The Credibility Factor

Olivier Arifon

Abstract


This paper presents arguments to evaluate soft power as perceived by the European Union (EU) and by China. Since the presentation of Joseph Nye’s concept of soft power, it has become apparent that notions of audience and message reception are important. We will further argue for the relevance of the psychological idea of dissonance. We will compare and contrast soft power discourses for their alignment with reality, and assess them for discrepancy. Ultimately, we will conclude that such contradictions exist and create a “dissonance” or disjunction, which we will explore in relation to the concept of credibility. In the second section, an analysis of China’s soft power serves to highlight the effects of the implementation by a “hard” state, in a centralized and controlled manner, of a soft power policy. We will examine tables in an effort to extend our comparison beyond the discourses perpetuated and promoted by both China and the EU. We will challenge these discourses using indices, including the World Press Freedom Index by Reporters Without Borders, the Corruption Perception Index by Transparency International, as well as The Good Country Index, The Soft Power 30, and the World Justice Index, each representing a component of soft power as proposed by Nye, i.e., culture, political values and foreign policy. Additionally, we will closely examine social questions to better develop our understanding of soft power policy. Results indicate that while credibility appears more important to China than to the EU, it is, nonetheless, a central tenet for both parties. The third section takes a comparative approach to its discussion of the normative power of European and Chinese soft power. It reveals contradictions within the policies of both political bodies, and simultaneously draws two conclusions. First, that a “cultural fool” does not exist, i.e., individuals are able to decipher and understand messages. Secondly, that individuals attribute credibility or unreliability to policy messages framed by a state, an organization, or the media. 


Keywords


China; communication; credibility; dissonance; European Union; image; normative power; perception; soft power

Full Text:

PDF

References


Balme, Stéphanie. 2004. Entre soi, l’élite du pouvoir dans la chine contemporaine. Paris: Fayard.

Barr, Michael. 2012. “Nation Branding as Nation Building: China’s Image Campaign”, East Asia 29 (1), pp. 81–94.

Bates, G. and Yanzhong, H. 2006. “Sources and limits of Chinese Soft power”, Survival 48 (2), pp. 17–36.

Billeter, Jean-François. 2006. Chine trois fois muette. Paris, Edition Allia.

Callahan, W.A. 2015, “Identity and Security in China: The Negative Soft Power of the China Dream”, Politics 35, pp. 216–229.

Courmont, Barthelemy. 2012. « Le soft power chinois : entre stratégie d’influence et affirma-tion de puissance ». Revue d’études comparatives, 43 (1-2), pp. 287-309.

D’Hooge, Ingrid. 2010. The limits of China’s Soft power in Europe. www.clingendael.nl/asia/publications (Accessed 5/2/2017).

D’Hooge, Ingrid. 2014. The Chinese dream and successful communication with the world. www.clingendael.nl/publication/chinese-dream-and-successful-communication-world (Ac-cessed 5/2/2016).

Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall.

Goffman, Edward. 1967. Interaction Rituel: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.

Hocking, Brian and Melissen, Jan. Diplomacy and digital disruption, Paper presented at NATO PD Forum 2016, Brussels, 2016.

Huchet, Jean-François. “En marche vers la société d’harmonie“, Perspectives chinoises n° 2007/3, Hong Kong.

Jirik, John. 2016. « Shift or Stasis CCTV News and Soft Power ». International Journal of Communication 10 (0): 18.

Jullien, François. 1996. Traité de l’efficacité. Paris: Poche.

Laïdi, Zaki. 2008. EU Foreign Policy in a Globalized World: Normative Power and Social Preferences. London, Routledge

Laïdi, Zaki. 2008. Norms over Force. The Enigma of European Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lee, Shee and Melissen, Jan. 2011. Public diplomacy and soft power in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Li (Leah), Xi and Chitty, Narren. 2009. “Reframing national image: A methodological frame-work”, Conflict & communication online 8 (2). www.cco.regener-online.de (Accessed 12/3/2016).

Manners, Ian. 2002. « Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? » JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235 58.

Martel, Frédéric. 2010. Mainstream. Paris: Flammarion.

Martin-Necker, Alice. 2006. La politique étrangère de la chine populaire à l'ONU. Paris: L’Harmattan.

Neveu, Eric. 2009. Sociologie du journalisme. Paris: La Découverte.

Nye, Jr. Joseph. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.

Nye, Jr. Jospeh. 2011. The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs.

Ogien, Albert et Laugier, Sandra. 2014. Le principe démocratie, Enquête sur les nouvelles formes du politique, La Découverte, Paris

Rupnik, Jacques. 2014. Géopolitique de la démocratisation. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

Thefacts101. 2016. textbook Key facts, Content publisher.

Wang, Yiwei. 2013a. “Relational dimensions of a Chinese model of public diplomacy”, in Wang, Yiwei. 2013b. China Dream. Conference at the European Parliament, April 18, 2013.

Winkin, Yves. 2001. Anthropologie de la communication. Paris: Seuil.

Wolton, Dominique. 2009. Informer n’est pas communiquer. Paris: CNRS Éditions.

Yu, X. 2007. “The role of soft power in China’s external strategy”, Global review (trial issue) pp. 113–127.

Zaharna, R.S. Amelia, A. and Ali, F. Relational, networked, and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy. New York: Routledge, pp. 86–99.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/lcm-2018-002-arif



 


Lingue Culture Mediazioni - Languages Cultures Mediation
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (27/11/2013 n. 380)
Online ISSN 2421-0293 - Print ISSN 2284-1881


Dipartimento di Scienze della Mediazione Linguistica e di Studi Interculturali
Università degli Studi di Milano


Editors-in-Chief: Paola Catenaccio (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Giuliana Garzone (IULM, Milano)
Editorial Board: Marina Brambilla (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Maria Vittoria Calvi (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Gabriella Cartago (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Lidia Anna De Michelis (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Giovanni Garofalo (Università degli Studi di Bergamo) - Dino Gavinelli (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Antonella Ghersetti (Università di Venezia Ca’ Foscari) - Maria Grazia Guido (Università del Salento) - Elena Liverani (IULM, Milano) - Stefania Maci (Università degli Studi di Bergamo) - Andrea Maurizi (Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca) - Chiara Molinari (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Stefano Ondelli (Università degli Studi di Trieste) - Davide Papotti (Università degli Studi di Parma) - Francesca Santulli (Università di Venezia Ca’ Foscari) - Girolamo Tessuto (Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli) - Giovanni Turchetta (Università degli Studi di Milano) - Stefano Vicari (Università degli Studi di Genova)
International Scientific Committee: James Archibald (McGill University, Montreal) - Natalija G. Bragina (Institut Russkogo Jazyka im. A.S. Puškina; RSUH, Mosca) - Kristen Brustad (University of Texas at Austin) - Luciano Curreri (University of Liège) - Hugo de Burgh (University of Westminster) - Giuditta Caliendo (Université de Lille) - Giorgio Fabio Colombo (Nagoya University Graduate School of Law) - Daniel Dejica (Universitatea Politehnica Timisoara) - Anna De Fina (Georgetown University, USA) - Claudio Di Meola, (Sapienza Università di Roma) - Denis Ferraris (Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris) - Lawrence Grossberg (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) - Stephen Gundle (University of Warwick) - Décio de Alencar Guzmán (Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém,  Brasile) - Matthias Heinz (Universität Salzburg) - Rosina Márquez-Reiter (The Open University) - Samir Marzouki (Université de Manouba à Tunis) - (John McLeod, University of Leeds) - Estrella Montolío Durán (Universitat de Barcelona) - M'bare N'gom (Morgan State University, Baltimore) - Christiane Nord (Magdeburg-Stendal University of Applied Sciences) - Daragh O'Connell (Cork University) - Roberto Perin (York University, Toronto) - Giovanni Rovere (Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) - Lara Ryazanova-Clarke (University of Edinburgh) - Françoise Sabban (École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris) - Kirk St.Amant (Louisiana Tech University, University of Limerick/University of Strasbourg) - Paul Sambre (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven) - Srikant Sarangi (Aalborg University) - Junji Tsuchiya (Waseda University, Tokyo) - Xu Shi (Zhejiang University)
Section editors: Maria Matilde Benzoni, Università degli Studi di Milano (Modern history) - Paola Cotta Ramusino, Università degli Studi di Milano (Russian linguistics and translation) - Mario de Benedittis, Università degli Studi di Milano (Sociology) - Kim Grego Università degli Studi di Milano (English linguistics and translation) - Giovanna Mapelli, Università degli Studi di Milano (Spanish linguistics and translation) - Bettina Mottura, University of Milan (Chinese studies) - Mauro Giacomo Novelli, Università degli Studi di Milano (Contemporary Italian literature and culture) - Letizia Osti, Università degli Studi di Milano (Arab studies) - Maria Cristina Paganoni, Università degli Studi di Milano (English linguistics and translation) - Giuseppe Sergio, Università degli Studi di Milano (Italian linguistics) - Virginia Sica, Università degli Studi di Milano (Japanese studies)

Editor of LCM - The Series: Marie-Christine Jullion


Referee List