Abstract

This study investigates the role of war metaphors in conveying agency and responsibility within climate discourse, specifically in the context of COP27. Using a corpus of The New York Times articles and editorials from October to December 2022, the article analyses linguistic metaphors and frames and the extent to which metaphors can influence perceptions of climate action. The methodology involved using WMatrix 5 to extract words related to the source domain of war. The results show that war metaphors effectively convey the urgency to act against climate change, representing it as a violent force that especially affects vulnerable nations. The war frames assign different levels of agency to groups of social actors. Nations categorized as poor are depicted as the most affected by climate events and requiring external assistance while developing countries are portrayed as active participants in fighting climate
change. Developed countries are framed as vaguely responsible and committed to future actions rather than immediate measures against climate change. The study shows how war metaphors can shape perceptions of agency and global responsibility in climate discourse.

Asplund, Therese. 2011. “Metaphors in Climate Discourse: An Analysis of Swedish Farm Magazines”. Journal of Science Communication 10 (4): A01.

https://doi.org/10.22323/2.10040201

Atanasova, Dimitrinka, and Nelya Koteyko. 2017. “Metaphors in Guardian Online and Mail Online Opinion-Page Content on Climate Change: War, Religion, and Politics”. Environmental Communication 11 (4): 452-469.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1024705

Augé, Anaïs. 2023. Metaphor and Argumentation in Climate Crisis Discourse. London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003342908

Boylan, Brandon M., Jerry McBeath, and Bo Wang. 2021. “US-China Relations: Nationalism, the Trade War, and COVID-19”. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences 14 (1): 23-40.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-020-00302-6

Christoff, Peter. 2010. “Cold Climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15”. Environmental Politics 19 (4): 637-656.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2010.489718

Deignan, Alice, Elena Semino, and Shirley-Anne Paul. 2019. “Metaphors of Climate Science in Three Genres: Research Articles, Educational Texts, and Secondary School Student Talk”. Applied Linguistics 40 (2): 379-403.

https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx035

Dreyfus, Shoshana. 2017. “‘Mum, the Pot Broke’: Taking Responsibility (or Not) in Language”. Discourse & Society 28 (4): 374-391.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517703222

Entman, Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm”. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51-58.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Ferrari, Federica. 2018. Metaphor and Persuasion in Strategic Communication: Sustainable Perspectives. 1st ed. London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315188461

Flusberg, Stephen J., Teenie Matlock, and Paul H. Thibodeau. 2017. “Metaphors for the War (or Race) against Climate Change”. Environmental Communication 11 (6): 769-783.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111

Happer, Catherine, and Greg Philo. 2016. “New Approaches to Understanding the Role of the News Media in the Formation of Public Attitudes and Behaviours on Climate Change”. European Journal of Communication 31 (2): 136-151.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115612213

Kellner, Douglas. 1995. Media Culture: Cultural Studies, Identify and Politics between the Modern and the Postmodern. London: Routledge.

Kurz, Tim, and Annayah M.B. Prosser. 2021. “Understanding the Social Dynamics of Climate Change through Analyses of Discourse”. Psychology of Climate Change (2021) 42 (December): 71-75.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.03.010

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Merkl-Davies, Doris M., and Veronika Koller. 2012. “‘Metaphoring’ People out of This World: A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Chairman’s Statement of a UK Defence Firm”. Accounting Forum 36 (3): 178-193.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.02.005

Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and Political Discourse: Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Houndmills - Basingstoke - Hampshire - New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Musolff, Andreas. 2006. “Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse”. Metaphor and Symbol 21 (1): 23-38.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2

Musolff, Andreas. 2016. Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.

Musolff, Andreas. 2022. “Fake Conspiracy: Trump’s Anti-Chinese ‘COVID-19-as-War’ Scenario”. In Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi, and Angela Zottola, 98: 121-140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.98.06mus

Nerlich, Brigitte, Nelya Koteyko, and Brian Brown. 2010. “Theory and Language of Climate Change Communication”. WIREs Climate Change 1 (1): 97-110.

https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.2

Nguyen, Dennis, and Erik Hekman. 2022. “A ‘New Arms Race’? Framing China and the U.S.A. in A.I. News Reporting: A Comparative Analysis of the Washington Post and South China Morning Post”. Global Media and China 7 (1): 58-77.

https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364221078626

Post, Senja, Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw, and Mike S. Schäfer. 2019. “Between Guilt and Obligation: Debating the Responsibility for Climate Change and Climate Politics in the Media”. Environmental Communication 13 (6): 723-739.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1446037

Pragglejaz Group. 2007. “MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse”. Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1): 1-39.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752

Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Semino, Elena. 2021. “‘Not Soldiers but Fire-Fighters’ – Metaphors and Covid-19”. Health Communication 36 (1): 50-58.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989

Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, Andrew Hardi, Sheila Payne, and Paul Rayson, eds. 2018. Metaphor, Cancer and the End of Life: A Corpus-based Study. London - New York: Routledge.

Shaw, Christopher, and Brigitte Nerlich. 2015. “Metaphor as a Mechanism of Global Climate Change Governance: A Study of International Policies, 1992-2012”. Ecological Economics 109 (January): 34-40.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.001

Steen, Gerard, Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, and Tina Krennmayr. 2010. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Stoddart, Mark C.J., D.B. Tindall, and Kelly L. Greenfield. 2012. “‘Governments Have the Power’? Interpretations of Climate Change Responsibility and Solutions Among Canadian Environmentalists”. Organization & Environment 25 (1): 39-58.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026612436979

Supran, Geoffrey, and Naomi Oreskes. 2021. “Rhetoric and Frame Analysis of Ex­xon­Mobil’s Climate Change Communications”. One Earth 4 (5): 696-719.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.014

Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6

UNSD – The United Nations Statistics Division. 2023. Standard Country or Area Codes for Statistical Use (M49). [27/11/2023].

https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/

van Dijk, Teun A. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.

van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Vincent Reid, Samuel. 2022. “Analysing Agency in Linguistic Representations of Action”. Discourse & Society 33 (2): 235-263.

https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221088144

World Resources Institute. 2022. Climate Watch Historical GHG Emissions. [04/2023].

https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions