Email this article El Método ABN como articulador efectivo de aprendizajes matemáticos en la infancia: experiencias en profesores y profesoras de ciclo inicial en Chile
Abstract
Results are presented abut a professional development workshop based on the ABN Method for learning mathematics (N = 27), conducted in Talca, Chile, for Pre-K and Primary in-service teachers (children from 4 to 7 years of age in charge). The workshop is aimed at nursery school teachers and first grade teachers. The ABN Method is based on the significant learning of the decimal number system and on the complete domain of operations and their properties, which are learned and assimilated at the same time by children from the early stages of teaching. The results of the study show that the participation of teachers in the workshop generated significant changes in a set of teachers’ beliefs, as well as a favorable change in the perception regarding the mathematical ability of their students. Finally, teachers report a greater conceptual clarity regarding the sequencing of contents and the purpose of the mathematical activities they perform in the classroom. The results and implications of this workshop are discussed.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adamuz-Povedano, N., & Bracho-López, R. (2014). Algoritmos flexibles para las operaciones básicas como modo de favorecer la inclusión social. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social (RIEJS), 3, 37-53.
Aragón, E., Canto, M.C., Marchena, E., Navarro, J., & Aguilar, M. (2017). Cognitive profile in learning mathematics with open calculation based on numbers (ABN) algorithm. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 2017, 22, 54-59. doi: 10.1387/RevPsicodidact.16396
Aragón, E., Delagado, C., & Marchena, E. (2017). Diferencias de aprendizaje matemático entre los métodos de enseñanza ABN y CBC. Psychology, Society, & Education, 9, 61-70.
Baroody, A. (2017). The use of concrete experiences in Early Childhood Mathematics Instruction. In Advances in Child Development and Behavior. The Development of Early Childhood. Sarama, J., Clements, D., Germeroth, C., & Day-Hess, C. (Eds). Academic Press:London, 43-87.
Bellei, C. (2013). El estudio de la segregación económica y académica de la educación chilena. Estudios Pedagógicos, 39, 325-345. doi:10.4067/S0718-07052013000100019
Bracho-López, R. (2013). Menos reglas y más sentido: alternativas metodológicas a los algoritmos de cálculo tradicionales para el desarrollo del sentido numérico en la educación primaria. Actas del VII CIBEM, Montevideo, 70-77.
Bracho-López, R. Gallego-Espejo, M.C., Adamuz-Povedano, N., & Jiménez-Fanjul, N. (2014). Impacto Escolar de la Metodología Basada en Algoritmos ABN en Niños y Niñas de Primer Ciclo de Educación Primaria. Unión, Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Matemática, 39, 97-109.
Calvani, A., & Vivanet, G. (2014). Evidence Based Education e modelli di valutazione formativa per le scuole. [Evidence Based Education and School Education Evaluation Models]. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS) 9, 127-146.
Canto. M. (2017). Método de Aprendizaje Matemático Abierto Basado en Números como alternativa al Método Cerrado Basado en Cifras (CBC). Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Cádiz.
Cera, R., Mancini, M., & Antonietti, A. (2013). Relationships between Metacognition, Self-efficacy and Self-regulation in Learning. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS) 7, 115-141. doi: 10.7358/ecps-2013-007-cera
Cerda, G., Pérez, C., Giaconi, V., Perdomo-Díaz, J., Reyes, C., & Felmer, P. (2017). The effect of a professional development program workshop about problem solving on mathematics teachers’ ideas about the nature of mathematics, achievements in mathematics, and learning in mathematics. Psychology, Society, & Education, 9, 11-26.
Colgan, L. (2014). Making math children will love: Building positive mathitudes to improve student achievement in Mathematics. What Works?. Research into Practice Research Monograph 56. Student Achievement Division, Ontario Ministry of Education. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/WW_MakingMath.pdf
Coyne, S., Linder, R., Rasmussen, E., Nelson, D., & Collier, K. (2014). It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s a gender stereotype!: Longitudinal associations between superhero viewing and gender stereotyped play. Sex Roles, 9-10, 416-430. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0374-8
Cvencek, D., Kapur, M., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Math achievement, stereotypes, and math self-concepts among elementary-school students in Singapore. Learning and Instruction, 39, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.04.002
Dehaene, S. (1997). The Number Sense. How the Mind Creates Mathematics. Oxford University Press.
Duffy, M. C., Muis, K. R., Foy, M. J., Trevors, G., & Ranellucci, J. (2016). Exploring Relations between Teachers’ Beliefs, Instructional Practices, and Students’ Beliefs in Statistics. International Education Research, 4, 37-66. doi:10.12735/ier.v4i1p37
Friz, M., Sanhueza, S., Sánchez, A., Sámuel, M., & Carrera, C. (2009). Concepciones en la enseñanza de la Matemática en educación infantil. Perfiles Educativos, 31, 62-73.
García-Ferrando, M., Ibáñez, J., & Alvira, F. (Eds) (2013). El análisis de la realidad social. Métodos y técnicas de investigación. Tercera edición. España:Alianza Editorial.
Gómez Alfonso, B. (1988). Numeración y cálculo. Madrid: Síntesis.
Heymann, H. (2003). Why Teach Mathematics?.A focus on general education. Mathematics Education Library, Springer-Verlag:New York.
Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit Indices in Covariance Structure Modeling: Sensitivity to Underparameterized Model Misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
Hufferd-Ackles, K, Fuson, K., & Gamoran, M. (2004). Describing Levels and Components of a Math-Talk Learning Community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 81-116. doi: 10.2307/30034933
Isoda, M. (2010). Lesson Study: Problem Solving Approaches in Mathematics Education as a Japanese Experience. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.003
Jaciw, A., Hegseth, W., Lin., L., Toby, M., Newman, D., Ma, B., & Zacamy, J. (2016). Assessing Impacts of Math in Focus, a “Singapore Math” Program. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9, 473-502. doi:10.1080/19345747.2016.1164777
Martínez, J. (2012). Desarrollo y mejora de la inteligencia matemática en educación infantil. Wolters Kluwer Educación.
Martínez, J., & Sánchez, C., (2013). Resolución de problemas y método ABN. Wolters Kluwer Educación.
MINEDUC (2009). Análisis de las competencias en NB1: caracterización de los niveles de complejidad de las tareas matemáticas: Santiago Chile.
MINEDUC (2010a). Resultados Nacionales SIMCE. Unidad de Curriculum y Evaluación, UCE.
MINEDUC (2010b). Resumen de Resultados PISA 2009 Chile. Unidad de Curriculum y Evaluación, UCE.
MINEDUC (2012). Bases curriculares de la Educación Básica. Ministerio de Educación, Chile.
MINEDUC. (2013). Impacto de asistir a educación parvularia. Centro de estudios Ministerio de Educación, Chile. Serie Evidencias, 2, 1-7.
MINEDUC (2014a). Nueva evidencia sobre el impacto de la Educación Parvularia. Centro de Estudios, Ministerio de Educación, Chile. Serie Evidencias, 3, 1-7. Disponible en: https://centroestudios.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/sites/100/2017/06/A3N26_Impacto_Parvularia_2.pdf
MINEDUC (2014b). Cuadernillos de Orientaciones Pedagógicas, Educación Parvularia – 1º NT y 2º NT. Núcleo de aprendizajes. Relaciones lógico-matemáticas y cuantificación. Unidad de Educación Parvularia, Ministerio de Educación, Chile.
Muis, K. R. (2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of educational research, 74, 317-377.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008). Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel, U.S. Department of Education: Washington, DC, 2008.
Ormeño, C., Rodríguez, S., & Bustos, V. (2015). Dificultades que presentan las educadoras de párvulos para desarrollar el pensamiento lógico matemático en los niveles de transición. [Difficulties of kindergarten educators to develop logical mathematical thinking at transition levels]. Páginas Educativas, 6, 1-19.
Philipp, R. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ belief and affect. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 257–315). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing/National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Preiss, D. D. (2009). The Chilean instructional pattern for the teaching of language: A video-survey study based on a national program for the assessment of teaching. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 1-11. doi:10.1016/ j.lindif.2008.08.004
Preiss, D., Larraín, A. y Valenzuela, S. (2011). Discurso y Pensamiento en el Aula Matemática Chilena Discourse and Thought in the Chilean Mathematics Classroom. Psykhe, 20, 131-146.
Richardson, V. (2003). Preservice teachers’ beliefs. Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education, 6, 1-22.
Schmeisser, C., Krauss, S., Bruckmaier, G., Ufer, S., & Blum, W. (2013). Transmissive and Constructivist Beliefs of in-Service Mathematics Teachers and of Beginning University Students. In Proficiency and Beliefs in Learning and Teaching Mathematics (pp. 51-67). Sense Publishers.
Tatto, M. T. (Ed.). (2013). The Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M): Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries. Technical Report. Amsterdam: IEA.
Trinchero, R. (2012). La ricerca e la sua valutazione. Istanze di qualità per la ricerca educativa [Research and its Evaluation. The Need for Quality in Educational Research]. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS) 6, 75-96. doi: 10.7358/ecps-2012-006-trin
Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Kunter, M., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs. In Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers (pp. 249-271). Springer USA.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2018-017-pere
Copyright (©) 2018 Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal) – Editorial format and Graphical layout: copyright (©) LED Edizioni Universitarie
Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS)
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (19/05/2010 n. 278)
Online ISSN 2037-7924 - Print ISSN 2037-7932
Research Laboratory on Didactics and Evaluation - Department of Education - "Roma Tre" University
Executive Editor: Gaetano Domenici - Associate Executive Editor & Managing Editor: Valeria Biasci
Editorial Board: Eleftheria Argyropoulou - Massimo Baldacci - Joao Barroso - Richard Bates - Christofer Bezzina - Paolo Bonaiuto - Lucia Boncori - Pietro Boscolo - Sara Bubb - Carlo Felice Casula - Jean-Émile Charlier - Lucia Chiappetta Cajola - Carmela Covato - Jean-Louis Derouet - Peter Early - Franco Frabboni - Constance Katz - James Levin - Pietro Lucisano - Roberto Maragliano - Romuald Normand - Michael Osborne - Donatella Palomba - Michele Pellerey - Clotilde Pontecorvo - Vitaly V. Rubtzov - Jaap Scheerens - Noah W. Sobe - Francesco Susi - Giuseppe Spadafora - Pat Thomson
Editorial Staff: Fabio Alivernini - Guido Benvenuto - Anna Maria Ciraci - Massimiliano Fiorucci - Luca Mallia - Massimo Margottini - Giovanni Moretti - Carla Roverselli
Editorial Secretary:Nazarena Patrizi
© 2001 LED Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto