Email this article Il maharaja, l’elefante e la qualità dell’(e)Learning
Abstract
(The Maharaja, the Elephant and the Quality of (e)Learning)
Starting from a metaphor coming from the story «The six blind men and the elephant», this paper introduces the most significant results of a study carried out over the last ten years on the topic of the quality of (e)Learning. Overall, it focuses on the four levels through which quality can be analyzed: epistemological, theoretical, methodological and of method. Furthermore, it identifies the categories that constitute the basis of such an analysis: dimensions, levels, stakeholders and time. Accordingly, the paper highlights the characteristics of the quality of (e)Learning on the basis of the authors’ empirical research work: the term «mediated quality» is presented as a concept that encompasses a participatory, trans/formative and open quality. Therefore, the paper illustrates the specific results, from the processes to the instruments adopted to mediate the quality of the empirical study,. The authors come up with the following reflection: if the quality of (e)Learningif is to be based on a constructivist epistemology, a pedagogical vision and a mixed methodological approach with a strong qualitative orientation, and if quality is to be mediated with instruments that enhance participation, transformation and openness, then a scholarship, iterative, participatory, open and eclectic learning design is required. To conclude, the authors hope, with the maharaja of the story, that research collaboration, as proposed in this paper, will lead to improve further results regarding the quality of (e)Learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agenzia Nazionale del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca (2013). AVA – Autovalutazione, valutazione e accreditamento del sistema universitario italiano. Roma. Retrieved from: http://www.anvur.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26&Itemid=222〈=it.
Anderson, J., & McCormick, R. (2006). Pedagogic quality-supporting the next UK generation of e3-learning. In U. Ehlers & J. M. Pawlowski (Eds.), Handbook on quality and standardisation in e-learning (pp. 407-421). Heidelberg: Springer.
Bates, A. W. T., & Sangra, A. (2011). Managing technology in higher education: Strategies for transforming teaching and learning (Google ebook). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Bednar, K. A., Cunningham, D., Duffy, M. T., & Perry, J. D. (1992). Theory into practice: How do we link? In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen, Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Damiano, E., Giannandrea, L., Magnoler, P., & Rossi, P. G. (2013). La mediazione didattica. Per una teoria dell’insegnamento. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Ehlers, U. (2007). Quality literacy – Competencies for quality development in education and e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Special Issue: Quality research for learning, education, and training, 10(2), 96-108.
Ehlers, U. (2009). Understanding quality culture. Quality Assurance in Education, 17(4), 343-363. doi: 10.1108/09684880910992322.
Ehlers, U. (2011). Quality literacy. Competences for quality development in education and e-learning. REM – Research on Education and Media, 3(2), 195-218.
Ehlers, U. (2013). Open learning cultures. London: Springer.
Ehlers, U., Helmstedt, C., & Bijnens, M. (2011). Shared evaluation of quality in learning. Duisburg: SEVAQ+ Project.
Ehlers, U., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2006). Handbook on quality and standardisation in e-learning. Heidelberg: Springer.
Ehlers, U., & Schneckenberg, D. (2010). Changing cultures in higher education: Moving ahead to future learning. Berlin: Springer.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1991). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Multidisciplinary. Newsletter for Activity Theory, 7/8, 14-15.
European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (2009). ENQA – Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area (3rd ed.). Helsinki. Retrieved from: http://www.enqa.eu.
European Commission (2011). Press release – Modernising higher education – Facts and figures. Reference: MEMO/11/613. Retrieved from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-11-613_en.htm?locale=EN (consulted 07/06/2013).
European Commission (2013). Opening up Education: Innovative teaching and learning for all through new technologies and open educational resources. COM(2013), 654 final.
Fletcher, A. (2005). Meaningful student involvement. Guide to students as partners in school change (2nd ed.). http://www.soundout.org/MSIGuide.pdf (consulted 11/07/2013).
Frabboni, F., & Callari Galli, M. (a cura di). (1999). Insegnare all’università. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Galliani, L. (1993). Didattica come organizzazione sistemica delle azioni formative. In L. Calonghi (a cura di), Nel bosco di Chirone. Napoli: Tecnodid.
Ghislandi, P. (2004). Criteri di qualità dei sistemi eLearning. Le risorse. In Commissione regionale per la certificazione dei materiali didattici e dei servizi per la formazione a distanza (a cura di), Guida alla qualità dei sistemi eLearning Unione
Europea, Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche sociali (pp. 34-49). Regione Emilia-Romagna. Retrieved from: http://www.regione.emilia-romagna.it/cerfad/default.htm.
Ghislandi, P. (2005). Didattiche per l’università (1a ed., pp. 1-306). Trento: Trento University Press.
Ghislandi, P. (a cura di). (2007). Verso la eUniversity. Contributi per una nuova didattica universitaria / Towards eUniversity. Contributions for innovative teaching/learning in higher education. Trento: Università degli Studi di Trento.
Ghislandi, P. (2014). Quality teaching by design for learning / Qualità dell’insegnamento e progetto per apprendere. Formazione & Insegnamento / European Journal of Research on Education and Teaching, 1(12), 197-210. doi: 10746/-fei-XII-01-14_13.
Ghislandi, P., & Pedroni, A. (2009a). Modelli e strumenti per la qualità delle comunità di apprendimento online. In Didamatica 2009. Informatica per la didattica, Trento, Università degli Studi di Trento, Facoltà di Economia, Giurisprudenza, Sociologia, 22-24 Aprile.
Ghislandi, P., & Pedroni, A. (2009b). Comunità di apprendimento distribuite e qualità della didattica / Distributed learning communities and quality of the teaching/learning process. In T. Leo, R. Maragliano, F. Falcinelli, & P. Ghislandi (Eds.), Digital collaboration: Some issues about teachers (pp. 87-130). Napoli: ScriptaWEb.
Ghislandi, P., & Pedroni, A. (2011). Progettare eLearning: le rubric «ad Astra» per la valutazione di corsi accademici online. In Didattica universitaria online: Teorie, esperienze, strumenti, Vol. 2 (pp. 305-330). Napoli: Scriptaweb.
Ghislandi, P., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2012a). Participatory and constructivist-evaluation as part of eLearning quality: A case study. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth annual edition of ICERI: 5th International Conference of education, research and innovation (pp. 1143-1154), Madrid, 19-21 November. Barcelona: IATED.
Ghislandi, P., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2012b). Implementing quality e-learning in higher education: Change efforts, tensions and contradictions. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth annual edition of ICERI: 5th International Conference of education, research and innovation (pp. 1107-1117), Madrid, 19-21 November. Barcelona: IATED.
Ghislandi, P., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2013a). Building quality of eLearning in higher education: An approach to students’ quality literacy. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2013 World Conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications (pp. 188-198), Victoria (Canada), 24-28 June. Chesapeake,
VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Ghislandi, P., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2013b). La voce degli studenti per la qualità dell’eLearning nella formazione universitaria: un approccio partecipativo. In V. Grion & A. Cook-Sather, Students’ Voice: prospettive internazionali e pratiche emergenti in Italia (pp. 273-286). Milano: Guerini.
Ghislandi, P., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2014a). Quality teaching matters: Perspectives on quality teaching for the modernization of higher education. A position paper / Importanza della qualità dell’insegnamento per la modernizzazione della formazione universitaria. Un position paper. Formazione & Insegnamento
/ European Journal of Research on Education and Teaching, 12(1), 57-86. doi: 10746/-fei-XII-01-14_06.
Ghislandi, P., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2014b). Scholarship of teaching and learning per una didattica universitaria di qualità / Scholarship of teaching and learning for quality teaching and learning in higher education. Formazione & Insegnamento / European Journal of Research on Education and Teaching, 1(12),
-128. doi: 10746/-fei-XII-01-14_08.
Ghislandi, P., Raffaghelli, J., & Cumer, F. (2012). La qualità dell’eLearning. Un approccio qualitativo per l’analisi dei feedback degli studenti e dei docenti. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica / Journal of Theories and Research in Education. doi: 10.6092/issn.1970-2221/3218.
Ghislandi, P., Raffaghelli, J. E., & Job, R. (2013). Opening-up higher education: A case study. In J. Ng, V. Callaghan & R. Reilly (Eds.), Smart learning for the next generation. The big picture of Education – IC 2013 Conference (pp. 42-45), Abu Dhabi, 24-25 November. Abu Dhabi: iCampus.
Ghislandi, P., Raffaghelli, J. E., & Yang, N. (2013). Mediated quality. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 4(1), 56-73. doi: 10.4018/jdldc.2013010106.
Gibbs, G. (2010). Dimension of quality in higher education. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
Greene, J. C. (2006). Evaluation, democracy, and social change. In I. F. Shaw, J. C. Greene, & M. M. Mark (Eds.), The Sage handbook of evaluation (pp. 118-140). London - New York: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608078.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. London: Sage.
Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34.
King, J. A. (2005). Partecipatory evaluation. In S. Mathison (Ed.), The encyclopedia of evaluation. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. New Jersey, US: Prentice Hall.
Mayadas, F., Bourne, J., & Moore, J. C. (Eds.). (2003). Elements of quality online education. Practice and direction. Volume 4 in Sloan-C series. Sloan-C. McAleese, M. (2013). Report to the European Commission on improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe’s higher education institutions. Luxembourg:
Publication Office of the European Union. doi: 1.0.2766/42468 ISBN978-92-79-30360-9.
Moore, C. J. (2005). The Sloan Consortium quality framework and the five pillars. Sloan-C. Retrieved from: http://www.onlinelearningconsortium.org/publications/books/qualityframework.pdf.
Mortari, L. (2009). Ricercare e riflettere. La formazione del docente professionista. Roma: Carocci.
Pellerey, M. (2005). Verso una nuova metodologia di ricerca educativa: la ricerca basata su progetti (Design Based Research). Orientamenti Pedagogici, 52(5), 721-737.
Quigley, L. (1959). The blind men and the elephant. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Raffaghelli, J. E. (2014). A Scholarship of open teaching and learning. New basis for quality in higher education / La scholarship di una didattica aperta. Nuove basi per la formazione universitaria di qualità. Formazione & Insegnamento / European Journal of Research on Education and Teaching, 1(12), 211-244. doi: 10746/-fei-XII-01-14_14.
Raffaghelli, J. E., & Ghislandi, P. (2014). Quality, that complex issue: Collaborative design for quality networked learning in HE. In S. Bayne, C. Jones, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, & C. Sinclair (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on networked learning (pp. 236-244), Edimbourgh, 7-9 April.
Saisana, M., & D’Hombres, B. (2008), Higher education rankings: robusteness issues and critical assessment. How much confidence can we have in higher education rankings? Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European
Communities. doi: 10.2788/92295.
Sannino, A., & Sutter, B. (2011). Cultural-historical activity theory and interventionist methodology: Classical legacy and contemporary developments. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 557-570. doi: 10.1177/0959354311414969.
Semeraro, R. (2006). Valutazione e qualità della didattica universitaria. Le prospettive nazionali e internazionali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Shulman, S. L. (1999). Taking learning seriously. Change, 31(4), 10-17. Retrieved from: http://www.carnegiefoundation.org.
THE – Times Higher Education (2014). Retrieved from: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/methodology (consulted 04/09/2014).
Vygotskij, L. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Oxford: Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practices. Learning, meanings and identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotskij. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Williams, B. (2005). Quality. In S. Mathison (Ed.), The encyclopedia of evaluation. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Xodo, C. (2000). L’università che cambia. Padova: Cleup.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2014-010-ghis
Copyright (©) 2014 Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal) – Editorial format and Graphical layout: copyright (©) LED Edizioni Universitarie
Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS)
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (19/05/2010 n. 278)
Online ISSN 2037-7924 - Print ISSN 2037-7932
Research Laboratory on Didactics and Evaluation - Department of Education - "Roma Tre" University
Executive Editor: Gaetano Domenici - Associate Executive Editor & Managing Editor: Valeria Biasci
Editorial Board: Eleftheria Argyropoulou - Massimo Baldacci - Joao Barroso - Richard Bates - Christofer Bezzina - Paolo Bonaiuto - Lucia Boncori - Pietro Boscolo - Sara Bubb - Carlo Felice Casula - Jean-Émile Charlier - Lucia Chiappetta Cajola - Carmela Covato - Jean-Louis Derouet - Peter Early - Franco Frabboni - Constance Katz - James Levin - Pietro Lucisano - Roberto Maragliano - Romuald Normand - Michael Osborne - Donatella Palomba - Michele Pellerey - Clotilde Pontecorvo - Vitaly V. Rubtzov - Jaap Scheerens - Noah W. Sobe - Francesco Susi - Giuseppe Spadafora - Pat Thomson
Editorial Staff: Fabio Alivernini - Guido Benvenuto - Anna Maria Ciraci - Massimiliano Fiorucci - Luca Mallia - Massimo Margottini - Giovanni Moretti - Carla Roverselli
Editorial Secretary:Nazarena Patrizi
© 2001 LED Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto