Led On Line
Presentazione - About us
Novita' - What's new
E-Journals
E-books
Lededizioni Home Page Ricerca - Search
Catalogo - Catalogue
Per contattarci - Contacts
Per gli Autori - For the Authors
Statistiche - Statistics
Cookie Policy
Privacy Policy

“An Infinite and Endless Liar”: Paroles as a Case Study of the Pragmatics of Lying in Shakespeare

Aoife Beville

Abstract


Lying is part of our life and part of our literary canon, the choice to lie, not lie or almost lie is both a moral and linguistic one. In the present paper lying, and related concepts such as deliberate obfuscation and deceptive implicatures, will be examined from a pragmatic, specifically neo-Gricean perspective. The purpose of this study is to determine the role of deception in the process of characterisation, with a particular focus on the form and function of the mendacious language of Paroles, the “infinite and endless liar” in All’s Well That Ends Well. Following the analysis of current pragmatic definitions of lying, this article proposes a distinction between Off-Record Verbal Deception (ORVD) and prototypical lies in the analysis of textual examples, in order to understand how these strategic linguistic choices affect the construction of character.


Keywords


Pragmatics of lying; Shakespeare; Pragmastylistics; Characterization; Verbal Deception.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adler, Jonathan E. 1997. ‘Lying, Deceiving, or Falsely Implicating’. The Journal of Philosophy 94 (9): 435–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564617

Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. 2018 edition. Eastford, CT: Martino Fine Books.

Bacon, Francis. 1909. ‘I. Of Truth. Francis Bacon. 1909-14. Essays, Civil and Moral. The Harvard Classics’. In Essays, Civil and Moral, Ed. by Charles William Eliot. The Harvard Classics. New York: P. F. Collier and Son. https://www.bartleby.com/3/1/1.html.

Barker, Simon, ed. 2005. Shakespeare’s Problem Plays: All’s Well That Ends Well, Measure for Measure, Troilus and Cressida. New Casebooks. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Berensmeyer, Ingo, and Andrew Hadfield. 2015. ‘Mendacity in Early Modern Literature and Culture: An Introduction’. European Journal of English Studies 19 (2): 131–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2015.1039277.

Boas, Frederick S. 1910. Shakespeare and His Prececessors. London: John Murray.

Bok, Sissela. 1999. Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. New York: Vintage Books.

Bowles, Hugo. 2010. Storytelling and Drama: Exploring Narrative Episodes in Plays. Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 8. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.8

Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Uni-versals in Language Usage. Cambridge - New York: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

Busse, Beatrice, and Ulrich Busse. 2010. ‘Shakespeare’. In Historical Pragmatics, Ed. by Adreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsaine, 247-281. Handbooks of Pragmatics 8, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284.4.247.

Carson, Thomas L. 2006. "The Definition of Lying". Noûs 40 (2): 284-306.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0029-4624.2006.00610.x

Carson, Thomas L. 2016. "Frankfurt and Cohen on Bullshit, Bullshiting, Deception, Lying, and Concern with the Truth of What One Says". Pragmatics & Cognition 23 (1): 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.03car.

Chisholm, Roderick M., and Thomas D. Feehan. 1977. ‘The Intent to Deceive’. The Journal of Philosophy 74 (3): 143–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025605.

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2001. Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. 1st ed. 2001. Textual Explorations. New York: Longman.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315839349-1

Culpeper, Jonathan, and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Del Villano, Bianca. 2016. ‘“Nothing Is but What Is Not” Performing Constatives in Shakespeare’s Drama’. Lingue e Linguaggi 17: 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1285/i22390359v17p71.

Dynel, Marta. 2011. ‘A Web of Deceit: A Neo-Gricean View on Types of Verbal Deception’. International Review of Pragmatics 3 (2): 139–67. https://doi.org/10.1163/187731011X597497.

Dynel, Marta. 2015. ‘Intention to Deceive, Bald-Faced Lies, and Deceptive Implicature: Insights into Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface’. Intercultural Pragmatics 12 (3). https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0016.

Dynel, Marta. 2016. ‘Comparing and Combining Covert and Overt Untruthfulness: On Lying, Deception, Irony and Metaphor’. Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1: 174–208. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.oSdyn.

Dynel, Marta. 2020. ‘To Say the Least: Where Deceptively Withholding Information Ends and Lying Begins’. Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (2): 555–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12379.

Elam, Keir. 1980. The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama. London - New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203993309

Elam, Keir. 1984. Shakespeare's Universe of Discourse: Language-Games in the Comedies. Cambridge - New York: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.2307/1771977

Fallis, Don. 2009. ‘What Is Lying?’ Journal of Philosophy 106 (1): 29–56. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil200910612.

Fallis, Don. 2012. ‘Lying as a Violation of Grice’s First Maxim of Quality: Lying as a Violation of Grice’s First Maxim of Quality’. Dialectica 66 (4): 563–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-8361.12007.

Grice, Paul. 1989. ‘Logic and Conversation’. In Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hadfield, Andrew. 2013. ‘Literature and the Culture of Lying Before the Enlightenment’. Studia Neophilologica 85 (2): 133–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2013.850952.

Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen. 2013. English Historical Pragmatics. Edinburgh Textbooks on the English Language. Advanced. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Kastan, David Scott. 1985. ‘All’s Well That Ends Well and the Limits of Comedy’. ELH 52 (3), Autumn: 575-589. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2872998.

Kisielewska-Krysiuk, Marta. 2017. ‘Lying and Misleading within the Philosophy of Language: A Relevance-Theoretic Perspective’. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies, no. 26/2: 79–100. https://doi.org/10.7311/0860-5734.26.2.06.

Kizelbach, Urszula. 2014. The Pragmatics of Early Modern Politics: Power and Kingship in Shakespeare’s History Plays. Costerus New Series, 206. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky. 1967. ‘Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience’. In Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Enthological Society, Ed. by June Helm, 12–44. Seattle, London: University of Washington Press.

Lawrence, William Witherle. 1969. Shakespeare’s Problem Comedies. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Mahon, James Edwin. 2016. ‘The Definition of Lying and Deception’. Ed. by Edward N. Zalta. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Winter 2016 edition [2008]. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/lying-definition/. (10/05/2021)

Meibauer, Jörg. 2005. ‘Lying and Falsely Implicating’. Journal of Pragmatics 37 (9): 1373–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.007.

Meibauer, Jörg. 2011. ‘On Lying: Intentionality, Implicature, and Imprecision’. Intercultural Pragmatics 8 (2): 227-292. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2011.013.

Meibauer, Jörg. 2014. Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. De Gruyter Mouton. https://www.degruyter.com/view/title/123558.

Meibauer, Jörg. 2016. ‘Topics in the Linguistics of Lying: A Reply to Marta Dynel’. Intercultural Pragmatics 13 (1): 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2016-0004.

Meibauer, Jörg. 2018. ‘The Linguistics of Lying’. Annual Review of Linguistics 4 (1): 357–75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011817-045634.

Meibauer, Jörg. Ed. 2019. The Oxford Handbook of Lying. First Edition. Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Melchiori, Giorgio. 2010. Shakespeare: genesi e struttura delle opere. Roma; Bari: GLF editori Laterza.

Mullini, Roberta. 1985. ‘Playing the Fool: The Pragmatic Status of Shakespeare’s Clowns’. New Theatre Quarterly 1 (1): 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X00001457.

Mullini, Roberta. 1997. Il Fool in Shakespeare: A Fellow of Infinite Jest. Piccola Biblioteca Shakespeariana 13. Roma: Bulzoni.

Mullini, Roberta. 2007. ‘“A Shrewd Knave and an Unhappy”: The Fool in All’s Well That Ends Well’. Theta VII, Théâtre Tudor, 259–72. https://sceneeuropeenne.univ-tours.fr/theta/theta7.

Mullini, Roberta. 2016. ‘The Pragmatics of Dialogical Asides in Shakespeare’. Memoria Di Shakespeare: A Journal of Shakespearean Studies 3/2016: 69-81. https://doi.org/10.13133/2283-8759-3.

Orsini, Napoleone. 1946. ‘“Policy”: Or the Language of Elizabethan Machiavellianism’. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 9: 122–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/750312.

Reboul, Anne. 1994. ‘The Description of Lies in Speech Acts Theory’. In Pretending to Communicate, Ed. by Herman Parret. Berlin - Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110847116.292.

Rhodes, Neil. 2000. ‘The Controversial Plot: Declamation and the Concept of the “Problem Play”’. The Modern Language Review 95 (3): 609–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/3735490.

Rudanko, Juhani. 1993. Pragmatic Approaches to Shakespeare: Essays on Othello, Coriolanus, and Timon of Athens. Lanham: University Press of America.

Rudanko, Juhani. 2006. ‘Aggravated Impoliteness and Two Types of Speaker Intention in an Episode in Shakespeare’s Timon of Athens’. Journal of Pragmatics, Focus-on Issue: Text Pragmatics, 38 (6): 829–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.11.006.

Rudanko, Juhani. 2007. ‘Concepts for Analyzing Deception in Discourse Intended to Be Persuasive: Two Case Studies from Shakespearean Drama’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, no. 8:1: 109–26.

Saul, Jennifer. 2012a. ‘Just Go Ahead and Lie’. Analysis 72 (1): 3–9.

Saul, Jennifer. 2012b. Lying, Misleading, and What Is Said: An Exploration in Philosophy of Language and in Ethics. 2015 edition. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Scott, Kate. 2019. ‘Misleading and Relevance in Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night’. In Pragmatics and Literature, Ed. by Siobhan Chapman and Billy Clark, 93–114. John Benjamins Pub. Co.

Searle, John R. 1975. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. 1999 Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Shakespeare, William. 2016. The New Oxford Shakespeare: The Complete Works, Modern Critical Edition. Ed. by Gary Taylor, John Jowett, Terri Bourus, and Gabriel Egan. Modern Critical Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Snyder, Susan. 1992. ‘Naming Names in “All’s Well That Ends Well”’. Shakespeare Quarterly 43 (3): 265–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/2870528.

Snyder, Susan. 2008. ‘Introduction’. In All’s Well That Ends Well, 1–52. Oxford World’s Classics. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.

Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. ‘Common Ground’. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5): 701–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020867916902.

Stokke, Andreas. 2013. "Lying, Deceiving, and Misleading". Philosophy Compass 8 (4): 348-59.

https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12022

Stokke, Andreas. 2016. "Lying and Misleading in Discourse". Philosophical Review 125 (1): 83-134.

https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-3321731

Stokke, Andreas. 2019. "Bulshitting". In The Oxford Handbook of Lying. Ed. by Jörg Meibauer, 264-276. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.20

Tillyard, E. M. W. 1950. Shakespeare's Problem Plays. London: Chatto and Windus.

https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487574734

Toole, William B. 1966. Shakespeare’s Problem Plays: Studies in Form and Meaning. Berlin - Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111392226.

Vincent Marelli, Jocelyne, and Cristiano Castelfranchi. 1981. ‘On the Art of Deception: How to Lie While Saying the Truth’. In Studies in Language Companion Series, Ed. by Herman Parret, Marina Sbisà, and Jef Verschueren, 7:749. Amsterdam: John Benjamins 749-777. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.7.39vin.

Zagorin, Perez. 1990. Ways of Lying Dissimulation, Persecution, and Conformity in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.

https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674866379

Zagorin, Perez. 1996. ‘The Historical Significance of Lying and Dissimulation’. Social Research 63 (3): 863–912. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40972318.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ling-2021-002-bevi

Copyright (©) 2021 Aoife Beville – Editorial format and Graphical layout: copyright (©) LED Edizioni Universitarie

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 


Linguæ & - Rivista di lingue e culture moderne
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (06/04/2012 n. 185)
Online ISSN 1724-8698 - Print ISSN 2281-8952


Dipartimento di Scienze della Comunicazione, Studi Umanistici e Internazionali: Storia, Culture, Lingue, Letterature, Arti, Media
Università degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo


Editor-in-Chief: Roberta Mullini
Editorial Board: Maurizio Ascari - Stefano Beretta - Antonio Bertacca- Tania Collani - Chiara Elefante - Marina Guglielmi - Maryline Heck - Richard Hillman - Reinhard Johler - Stephen Knight - Cesare Mascitelli - Sonia Massai - Aurélie Moioli - Maria de Fátima Silva - Bart Van Den Bossche 

Editorial Staff: Margaret Amatulli - Alessandra Calanchi - Riccardo Donati - Ivo Klaver  - Massimiliano Morini - Antonella Negri - Luca Renzi


Referee List


© 2001 LED Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto