Led On Line
Presentazione - About us
Novita' - What's new
E-Journals
E-books
Lededizioni Home Page Ricerca - Search
Catalogo - Catalogue
Per contattarci - Contacts
Per gli Autori - For the Authors
Statistiche - Statistics
Cookie Policy
Privacy Policy

Immigrants Are Like … The Representation of Immigrants in Italy: The Metaphors Used by Students and Their Family Backgrounds

Elisa Cavicchiolo, Fabio Alivernini, Sara Manganelli

Abstract


The aim of this study is to identify the way young Italian students represent immigrants and to evaluate the existence of relationships between these representations and the family background of the students. The data is based on a sample of Italian students (N = 841). The respondents were given an open question, which asked them to provide a simile or a metaphor concerning immigrants. A mixed methodology was employed, which involved: (i) analysis of the qualitative content; (ii) quantitative analysis investigating the relationship between the categories identified by means of an analysis of the content and the socioeconomic status of the student. The results showed a very diverse and articulated set of representations, with the contents of the metaphors produced by the students ranging from those based on a kind of «us-them» opposition, to images based on an attitude of tolerance and equality, and semantic regions with a more emotional component. The analysis revealed some statistically significant relationships between the socio-economic backgrounds of the students’ families and some types of metaphors produced by the students. The mixed research methodology adopted proved to be effective with respect to the objectives of the study, and it combines the use of reliable statistical tools with the qualitative richness of metaphor-based answers to open questions.


Keywords


Immigrants; Mental representations; Metaphors; Mixed-method approach; Socioeconomic status

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alba, R., & Nee, V. (1997). Rethinking assimilation theory for a new era of immigration. The International Migration Review, 31(4), 826-874, doi: 10.2307/2547416.

Alivernini, F. (2012). Mixed methods research on learning. In M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. New York: Springer, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_846.

Alivernini, F., Cavicchiolo, E., Palmerio, L., & Girelli, L. (2015). Representations of study and students’ academic motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205, 302-305, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.086.

Alivernini, F., Lucidi, F., & Manganelli, S. (2008). Assessment of academic motivation: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 2(1), 71-82, doi: 10.5172/mra.455.2.1.71.

Alivernini, F., & Manganelli, S. (2016). The Classmates Social Isolation Questionnaire: An initial validation. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(2), 264-274, doi: 10.1080/17405629.2016.1152174.

Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

Barber, C., Torney-Purta, J., & Fennelly, K. (2010). Adolescents’ attitudes toward immigrants’ rights and nationalism in 25 countries. In 4th IEA International Research Conference (IRC-2010), Gothenburg (Sweden). Retrieved from: http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/IRC/IRC_2010/Papers/IRC2010_Barber_Torney-Purta_etal.pdf

Batson, C.D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety & W.J. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3-15). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0002.

Batson, C.D., Polycarpou, M.P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H.J., Mitchener, E.C., Bednar, L.L., et al. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105-118, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105.

Berry, J.W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5-34, doi: 10.1111 / j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x.

Berry, J.W. (2005). Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(6), 697-712, doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.013.

Biasi, V., Chiappetta Cajola, L., & Bonaiuto, P. (2010). Valutare la formazione degli schemi mentali nei disturbi dell’apprendimento. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 2, 117-138.

Blalock, H.M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York: J. Wiley & Sons, doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.10.002.

Blumer, H. (1958). Race prejudice as a sense of group position. The Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1), 3-7, doi: 10.2307/1388607.

Bohner, G., & Dickel, N. (2011). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 391-417, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131609.

Bonaiuto, P., Biasi, V., & Giannini, A. M. (2008). Connections between phenomenological-experimental research and psychodynamic constructs. Teorie & Modelli, 13(2/3), 197-216.

Brandini, S. (2015). A mixed methods analysis of students’ views of politics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 273-277, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.333.

Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (2006). Foundations of multimethod research: Synthesizing styles. Thousand Oaks, CA - London: Sage, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412984294.

Buzzi, C., Cavalli, A., & De Lillo, A. (a cura di). (2007). Rapporto giovani. Sesta indagine dell’Istituto IARD sulla condizione giovani in Italia. Bologna: il Mulino.

Caro, D.H., & Schulz, W. (2012). Ten hypotheses about tolerance toward minorities among Latin American adolescents. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 11(3), 213-234, doi: 10.2304/csee.2012.11.3.213.

Castelli, L., De Amicis, L., Carnaghi, A., & Arcuri, L. (2007). L’influenza dei processi intragruppo sul contatto intergruppi: il caso dei bambini in età prescolare. In R. Brown, D. Capozza, & O. Licciardello (a cura di), Immigrazione, acculturazione, modalità di contatto (pp. 117-135). Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Cavicchiolo, E., Alivernini, F., & Manganelli, S. (2015). Students’ images of immigrants in Italy: First results from a national mixed methods study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205, 163-167, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.049.

Coser, L. (1956). The functions of social conflict. New York: The Free Press.

Dovidio, J.F., Johnson, J.D., Gaertner, S.L., Pearson, A.R., Saguy, T., & Ashburn-Nardo, L. (2010). Empathy and intergroup relations. In M. Mikulincer & P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 393-408). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, doi: 10.1037/12061-020.

Dziobek, I., Rogers, K., Fleck, S., Bahnemann, M., Heekeren, H.R., Wolf, O.T., & Convit, A. (2008). Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 464-473, doi: 10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x.

Finlay, K.A, & Stephan, W.G. (2000). Improving intergroup relations: The effects of empathy on racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1720-1737, doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02464.x.

Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A.J.C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902, doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878.

Giovannini, D., Pintus, A., & Rinaldi, L. (2007). Immigrazione e pregiudizio: l’atteggiamento dei datori di lavoro verso i dipendenti extracomunitari in piccole e medie imprese trentine. In R. Brown, D. Capozza, & O. Licciardello (a cura di), Immigrazione, acculturazione, modalità di contatto (pp. 233-248). Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Hughes, M.A., & Garrett, D.E. (1990). Intercoder reliability estimation approaches in marketing: A genealizability theory framework for quantitative data. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(2), 185-195, doi: 10.2307/3172845.

Intraversato, A., & Lucisano, P. (2013). Gli anni di Eco. Riflessioni sull’uso di prove strutturate con risposte chiuse e aperte a margine di una ricerca sulla comprensione della lettura. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 7, 23-43, doi: 10.7358/ecps-2013-007-intr.

INVALSI (2012a). OCSE PISA 2012. Rapporto nazionale. Retrieved from: http://www.invalsi.it/invalsi/ri/pisa2012/rappnaz/Rapporto_NAZIONALE_OCSE_PISA2012.pdf

INVALSI (2012b). Indagini IEA 2011 PIRLS e TIMSS: i risultati degli studenti italiani in lettura, matematica e scienze. Retrieved from: http://www.invalsi.it/invalsi/ri/timss2011/documenti/Rapporto_PIRLS_TIMSS.pdf

INVALSI (2015). Rilevazioni nazionali degli apprendimenti 2014-2015. Retrieved from: https://invalsi-areaprove.cineca.it/docs/attach/035_ Rapporto_Prove_INVALSI_2015.pdf

Isac, M.M., Maslowski, R., & van der Werf, G. (2012). Native students attitudes towards equal rights for immigrants. A study in 18 European countries. JSSE – Journal of Social Science Education, 11(1), 7-22, doi: 10.2390/jsse-v11-i1-1189.

Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1989). Mental models. In M. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 469-499). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(199107)27:3.

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, doi: 10.1017/S0047404503254051.

Krippendorff, K. (1983). Analisi del contenuto: Introduzione metodologica. Torino: ERI.

Krosnick, J.A., Judd, C.M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2005). The measurement of attitudes. In D. Albarracin, B.T. Johnson, & M.P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 21-76). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, doi: 10.4324/9781410612823.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. Metaphor and thought. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, doi: 10.1525/aa.1982.84.4.02a00600.

La Marca, A. (2014). Nuovo realismo e metodi di ricerca mista. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 9, 397-416, doi: 10.7358/ecps-2014-009-lama.

Lebart, L., Piron, M., & Morineau, A. (1995). Statistique exploratoire multidimensionelle. Paris: Dunod.

Lee, T.L., & Fiske, S.T. (2006). Not an outgroup, not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the Stereotype Content Model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 751-768, doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.06.005.

Lucidi, F., Alivernini, F., & Pedon, A. (2008). Metodologia della ricerca qualitativa. Roma: il Mulino.

Lucisano, P., & Salerni, A. (2003). Metodologia della ricerca in educazione e formazione. Roma: Carocci.

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), Art. 20. Retrieved from: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204

Mezzadra, S. (2006). Diritto di fuga. Migrazioni, cittadinanza, globalizzazione. Verona: Ombre corte.

MIUR - Fondazione ISMU (2015). Alunni con cittadinanza non italiana – Tra difficoltà e successi. Rapporto nazionale a.s. 2013/2014 (Quaderni ISMU, 1). Retrieved from: http://www.istruzione.it/allegati/2015/Rapporto_alunni_cittadinanza_non_italiana_2013_14.pdf

Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211-250, doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180303.

Mosso, C. (2007). Immigrati: minaccia o risorsa per il sistema sociale? In R. Brown, D. Capozza, & O. Licciardello (a cura di), Immigrazione, acculturazione, modalità di contatto (pp. 266-279). Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Neuendorf, K.A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Pedersen, A., Beven, J.P., Walker, I., & Griffiths, B. (2004). Attitudes toward indigenous Australians: The role of empathy and guilt. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14(4), 233-249, doi: 10.1002/casp.771.

Pettigrew, T.F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85, doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65.

Pettigrew, T.F., & Tropp, L.R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.

Portes, A., Fernandez-Kelly, P., & Haller, W. (2005). Segmented assimilation on the ground: The new second generation in early adulthood. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(6), 1000-1040, doi: 10.1080/01419870500224117.

Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: Segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 530(1), 74-96, doi: 10.1177/0002716293530001006.

Quillan, L. (1995). Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review, 60, 586-611, doi: 10.2307/2096296.

Scalera, V., Palmerio, L., & Alivernini, F. (2007). La mia scuola è un’orchestra. Studio di validazione del questionario «Immagini di scuola attraverso le metafore»: ulteriori approfondimenti. Rivista di Psicologia dell’Educazione e della Formazione, 9(2), 5-36, doi: 10.4399/97888548159881.

Schulz, W., Ainley, J., & Fraillon, J. (Eds.). (2011). ICCS 2009 Technical report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Retrieved from: http://www.iea.nl/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Electronic_versions/ICCS_2009_Technical_Report.pdf

Schwartz, S.J., & Zamboanga, B.L. (2008). Testing Berry’s model of acculturation: A confirmatory latent class approach. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(4), 275-285, doi: 10.1037/a0012818.

Sherif, M. (1966). Group conflict and cooperation. Their social psychology. London: Routledge & K. Paul.

Sherif, M., & Sherif, C.W. (1969). Social psychology. New York: Harper & Row.

Stephan, W.G., & Stephan, C.W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23-45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, doi: 10.1177/0022022100031002006.

Stephan, W.G., & Stephan, C.W. (2001). Improving intergroup relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stephan, W.G., Ybarra, O., & Bachman, G. (1999). Prejudice toward immigrants: An integrated threat theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 559-576, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00107.x.

Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1-39, doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

Voci, A., & Hewstone, M. (2007). L’importanza dell’empatia nella relazione tra contatto e riduzione del pregiudizio. In R. Brown, D. Capozza, & O. Licciardello (a cura di), Immigrazione, acculturazione, modalità di contatto (pp. 33-49). Milano: FrancoAngeli.

Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529863.

Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488.n4.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2016-013-cavi



 


Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS)
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (19/05/2010 n. 278)
Online ISSN 2037-7924 - Print ISSN 2037-7932

Research Laboratory on Didactics and Evaluation - Department of Education - "Roma Tre" University


Executive Editor: Gaetano Domenici - Managing  Editor: Valeria Biasci
Editorial Board: Giuditta Alessandrini - Eleftheria Argyropoulou - Massimo Baldacci - Joao Barroso - Richard Bates - Christofer Bezzina - Paolo Bonaiuto - Lucia Boncori - Pietro Boscolo - Sara Bubb  - Carlo Felice Casula - Jean-Émile Charlier - Lucia Chiappetta Cajola - Carmela Covato - Jean-Louis Derouet - Peter Early - Franco Frabboni - Constance Katz - James Levin - Pietro Lucisano  - Roberto Maragliano - Romuald Normand - Michael Osborne - Donatella Palomba - Michele Pellerey - Clotilde Pontecorvo - Vitaly V. Rubtzov - Jaap Scheerens - Noah W. Sobe - Francesco Susi - Giuseppe Spadafora - Pat Thomson
Editorial Staff: Fabio Alivernini - Guido Benvenuto - Anna Maria Ciraci - Massimiliano Fiorucci - Luca Mallia - Massimo Margottini - Giovanni Moretti - Carla Roverselli 
Editorial Secretary:
Nazarena Patrizi