Email this article When the Black Sheep Is Not So «Black»: Social Comparison as a Standard for Ingroup Evaluation in Classrooms
Abstract
Previous research (Marques & Levine, 2016) suggests that the black sheep effect refers to the tendency of people to evaluate ingroup deviants members more negatively than outgroup deviants members. School students (N = 60) evaluated negative and positive performances attributed respectively to ingroup and outgroup members (unfavorable comparison) and negative performances attributed to both ingroup and outgroup members (neutral comparison). Results show that negative performances from ingroup members are less devaluated in the unfavorable comparisons condition than in the neutral comparisons condition and this effect is moderated by identification with their own school. Moreover, results show that in the unfavorable comparison condition students perceived a greater threat to their social identity than in the neutral comparison condition. The implications of these results are discussed in relation to the black sheep categorization and ingroup bias in a school context.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abrams, D. E., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of selfesteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4), 317-334.
Abrams, D., Marques, J., Bown, N., & Dougill, M. (2002). Anti-norm and pro norm deviance in the bank and on the campus: Two experiments on subjective group dynamics. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 5(2), 163-182.
Abrams, D., Marques, J. M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. (2000). Pro-norm and antinorm deviance within and between groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 906.
Bettencourt, B., Miller, N., & Hume, D. L. (1999). Effects of numerical representa tion within cooperative settings: Examining the role of salience in in‐group favouritism. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 265-287.
Biernat, M., & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 66(1), 5.
Biernat, M., Vescio, T. K., & Billings, L. S. (1999). Black sheep and expectancy violation: Integrating two models of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(4), 523-542.
Billig, M., & Tajfel, H. (1973). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(1), 27-52.
Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., & Lickel, B. (2000). Stigma, threat, and social interactions. In T. Heatherton, R. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (Eds.), Stigma (pp. 307-333). New York: Guilford.
Branscombe, N. R., Wann, D. L., Noel, J. G., & Coleman, J. (1993). Ingroup or outgroup extemity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(4), 381-388.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307.
Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429-444.
Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(6), 745-778.
Castano, E., Paladino, M. P., Coull, A., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2002). Protecting the ingroup stereotype: Ingroup identification and the management of deviant ingroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(3), 365-385.
Eidelman, S., & Biernat, M. (2003). Derogating black sheep: Individual or group protection? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 602-609.
Ellemers, N., Doosje, B., Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. (1992). Status protection in high status minority groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 123-140.
Ellemers, N., Pagliaro, S., Barreto, M., & Leach, C. W. (2008). Is it better to be moral than smart? The effects of morality and competence norms on the decision to work at group status improvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1397.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1997). Sticking together or falling apart: Ingroup identification as a psychological determinant of group commitment versus individual mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 617.
Feldman, J. M. (1972). Stimulus characteristics and subject prejudice as determinants of stereotype attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(3), 333.
Frings, D., Hurst, J., Cleveland, C., Blascovich, J., & Abrams, D. (2012). Challenge, threat, and subjective group dynamics: Reactions to normative and deviant group members. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16(2), 105.
Guilherme, F., Pinto, R. I., & Marques, M. J. (2012). The effects of social identity threat on reactions to normative and deviant group members: A subjective group dynamics approach. Psihologia Socială, 30, 19-32.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. White paper.
Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 575-604.
Hichy, Z., Mari, S., & Capozza, D. (2008). Pronorm and antinorm deviants: A test of the subjective group dynamics model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148(5), 641-644.
Hunter, J. A., Platow, M. J., Howard, M. L., & Stringer, M. (1996). Social identity and intergroup evaluative bias: Realistic categories and domain specific self-esteem in a conflict setting. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 631-647.
Hunter, J. A., Stringer, M., & Coleman, J. T. (1993). Social explanations and selfesteem in Northern Ireland. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133(5), 643-650.
Jetten, J., Postmes, T., & McAuliffe, B. J. (2002). «We’re all individuals»: Group norms of individualism and collectivism, levels of identification and identity threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(2), 189-207.
Levine, J. M., & Marques, J. M. (2016). Norm violators as threats and opportunities: The many faces of deviance in groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(5), 545-552.
Linville, P. W. (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(2), 193.
Linville, P. W., & Jones, E. E. (1980). Polarized appraisals of outgroup members.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(5), 689.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Social categorization, social identification, and rejection of deviant group members. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 400-424). Oxford: Blackwell.
Marques, J., Abrams, D., & Serodio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of ingroup deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 436.
Marques, J. M., & Paez, D. (1994). The «black sheep effect»: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 37-68.
Marques, J. M., Paez, D., & Abrams, D. (1998). Social identity and intragroup differentiation as subjective social control. In S. Worchel, J. F. Morales, D. Paèz, & J. C. Deschamps (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 124- 141). London: Sage.
Marques, J. M., Robalo, E. M., & Rocha, S. A. (1992). Ingroup bias and the «black sheep» effect: Assessing the impact of social identification and perceived variability on group judgements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(4), 331-352.
Marques, J. M., Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Leyens, J. P. (1988). The «black sheep effect»: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 1-16.
Pantaleo, G. (1997). Explorations in orienting vs. multiple perspectives. Berlin: Pabst Science. Pantaleo, G. (2002). Il ruolo delle prospettive multiple nell’inibizione dell’atteggiamento di intolleranza prodotto da una condizione di minaccia psicologica
[The role of multiple perspectives in inhibiting intolerance produced by psychological threat]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 3, 515-541.
Pantaleo, G., & Canessa, N. (2011). «Prospettive multiple», comportamento prosociale e altruismo. Oltre la Civiltà dell’empatia. In S. Boca & C. Scaffidi Abbate (Eds.), Altruismo e comportamento prosociale. Temi e prospettive a con- fronto (pp. 186-240). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Pantaleo, G., Miron, A., Ferguson, M., & Frankowski, S. (2014). Effects of deterrence on intensity of group identification and efforts to protect group identity. Motivation and Emotion, 38(6), 855-865. doi: 10.1007/s11031-014-9440-3
Pantaleo, G., & Wicklund, R. A. (2001). Multiple perspectives: Social performance beyond the single criterion. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, Special Issue: Motivation Gains in Groups, 31, 231-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024//0044- 3514.31.4.231
Pinto, I. R., Marques, J. M., Levine, J. M., & Abrams, D. (2010). Membership status and subjective group dynamics: Who triggers the black sheep effect? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 107.
Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). When are we better than them and they worse than us? A closer look at social discrimination in positive and negative domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 64.
Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (1998). Social identity theory’s self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychol- ogy Review, 2(1), 40-62.
Rullo, M., Presaghi, F., & Livi, S. (2015). Reactions to ingroup and outgroup devi- ants: An experimental group paradigm for black sheep effect. PloS One, 10(5), e0125605.
Ruttenberg, J., Zea, M. C., & Sigelman, C. K. (1996). Collective identity and intergroup prejudice among Jewish and Arab students in the United States. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(2), 209-220.
Scheepers, D. (2009). Turning social identity threat into challenge: Status stability and cardiovascular reactivity during inter-group competition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 228-233.
Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2005). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(2), 192-200.
Seta, J. J., & Seta, C. E. (1996). Big fish in small ponds: A social hierarchy analysis of intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1210.
Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personal- ity and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(5), 538-553.
Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96-102.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33, 47.
Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 187-204.
van Leeuwen, E., van den Bosch, M., Castano, E., & Hopman, P. (2010). Dealing with deviants: The effectiveness of rejection, denial, and apologies on protecting the public image of a group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(2), 282-299.
Vescio, T. K., & Biernat, M. (1999). When stereotype‐based expectancies impair performance: The effect of prejudice, race, and target quality on judgments and perceiver performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(7), 961-970.
Wicklund, R. A. (1999). Multiple perspectives in person perception and theorizing. Theory & Psychology, 9, 667-678.
Wicklund, R. A., & Brehm, J. W. (2004). Internalization of multiple perspectives of dissonance reduction? Theory & Psychology, 14, 355-371.
Wright, R. A., & Pantaleo, G. (2013). Effort processes in achieving performance outcomes: Interrelations among and roles of core constructs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(6), 705-706. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13001180
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2017-015-rull
Copyright (©) 2017 Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal) – Editorial format and Graphical layout: copyright (©) LED Edizioni Universitarie
Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS)
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (19/05/2010 n. 278)
Online ISSN 2037-7924 - Print ISSN 2037-7932
Research Laboratory on Didactics and Evaluation - Department of Education - "Roma Tre" University
Executive Editor: Gaetano Domenici - Associate Executive Editor & Managing Editor: Valeria Biasci
Editorial Board: Eleftheria Argyropoulou - Massimo Baldacci - Joao Barroso - Richard Bates - Christofer Bezzina - Paolo Bonaiuto - Lucia Boncori - Pietro Boscolo - Sara Bubb - Carlo Felice Casula - Jean-Émile Charlier - Lucia Chiappetta Cajola - Carmela Covato - Jean-Louis Derouet - Peter Early - Franco Frabboni - Constance Katz - James Levin - Pietro Lucisano - Roberto Maragliano - Romuald Normand - Michael Osborne - Donatella Palomba - Michele Pellerey - Clotilde Pontecorvo - Vitaly V. Rubtzov - Jaap Scheerens - Noah W. Sobe - Francesco Susi - Giuseppe Spadafora - Pat Thomson
Editorial Staff: Fabio Alivernini - Guido Benvenuto - Anna Maria Ciraci - Massimiliano Fiorucci - Luca Mallia - Massimo Margottini - Giovanni Moretti - Carla Roverselli
Editorial Secretary:Nazarena Patrizi
© 2001 LED Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto