Led On Line
Presentazione - About us
Novita' - What's new
E-Journals
E-books
Lededizioni Home Page Ricerca - Search
Catalogo - Catalogue
Per contattarci - Contacts
Per gli Autori - For the Authors
Statistiche - Statistics
Cookie Policy
Privacy Policy

The Effect of Conflict Cognitive Strategy in Inquiry-based Learning on Preservice Teachers’ Critical Thinking Ability

Saiful Prayogi, Ni Nyoman Sri Putu Verawati

Abstract


The current trend of learning goals for universities that they are able to produce preservice teachers who think critically and the teaching process focusing on the empirical inquiry activities is recommended as a foundation for practicing critical thinking. Generating preservice teachers’ prior knowledge in inquiry activities is needed using conflict cognitive strategies. Based on theoretical studies, the conflict cognitive strategy can treat learners to think critically. This study was aimed at describing the effects of the conflict cognitive strategy in inquiry-based learning model on preservice teachers’ critical thinking ability. This study was quasi-experimental research with one group pretest-posttest design. The sample of this study consisted of 18 preservice teachers of the physics study program at State Islamic University of Mataram. The preservice-teachers’ critical thinking ability were assessed using a critical thinking ability test instrument in the form of essay test. The data of critical thinking ability were analyzed descriptively and statistically, where homogeneity test, normality test, and t-test were applied. The results showed that the conflict cognitive strategy in inquiry-based learning model had a significant effect on preservice teachers’ critical thinking ability. The finding and discussion are further described in this article.


Keywords


Conflict cognitive strategy; Critical thinking ability; Inquiry-based learning model; Teacher preservice; Teaching based on empirical inquiry.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ambrose, S. & Lovett, M. (2014). Prior knowledge is more than content: skills and beliefs also impact learning. Applying Science of Learning in Education, 1(2), 7-19.

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Bailin, S. (2002). Critical thinking and science education. Science and Education, 11(4), 361-375.

Bower, N. (2006). Instructional support for the teaching of critical thinking: Looking beyond the red brick walls. Journal of Scholarly Teaching-Critical Thinking, 1(1), 10-25.

Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Children’s responses to anomalous scientific data: How is conceptual change impeded? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 327-343.

Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical text of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623-654.

Dolezal, S. E., Welsh, L. M., Pressley, M. & Vincent, M. M. (2003). How nine third-grade teachers motivate student academic engagement. The Elementary School Journal, 103(3), 239-267.

Ennis, R. H. (1991). Critical thinking: A streamlined conception. Teaching Philosophy, 14(1), 5-24.

Facione, P. (2011). Critical thinking. What it is and why its counts. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.

Facione, P. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.

Fine, M. & Desmond, L. (2015). Inquiry-based learning: Preparing young learners for the demands of the 21st century. Educator’s Voice, VIII, 2-11.

Foster, C. (2011). A slippery slope: Resolving cognitive conflict in mechanics. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 30, 216-221.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gallagher, J. J. (1965). The influence of a special school on cognitif style and attitudes of gifter students. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED026750).

Gronlund, N.E. (1982). Constructing achievement test (3rd Ed). London: Prentice-Hall.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. AREA-D American Education Research Association’s Devision Measurement and Reasearch Methodology

Hamlin, M. & Wisneski, D. (2012). Supporting the scientific thinking and inquiry of toddlers and preschoolers through play. Young Children, 67(3), 82-88.

Lai, E. (2011). Critical thinking: A literatur review. Pearson Research Reports. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonassessments.com/CriticalThinking ReviewFINAL.pdf

Lee, G., Jaesool, K., Sang, P., Jung K., Hyeok, K. & Hac, P. (2003). Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary-level science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 585-603.

Lee, G. & Kwon, J. (2001). What do you know about students’ cognitive conflict in science Education: A theoretical model of cognitive process. In Proceedings of 2001 AETS Annual meeting (pp. 309-325). Costa Mesa, CA: Retrieved from http://www.rhodes.aegean.gr/ptde

Lewis, A. & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 131-137.

Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357-380.

Limon, M. & Carretero, M. (1997). Conceptual change and anomalous data: A case study in the domain of natural sciences. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12(2), 213-230.

Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W. & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-200.

Pintrich, P. R. (1999). Motivational Beliefs as Resources for and Constraints on Conceptual Change. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, dan M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 33-50). Amsterdam: Pergamon

Prayogi, S., Muhali, Yuliyanti, S., Asy’ari, M., Azmi, I. & Verawati, N. N. S. P. (2019). The effect of presenting anomalous data on improving student’s critical thinking ability. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(6), 133-137.

Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L. & Wasis. (2018). Critical-Inquiry-Based-Learning: A Model of learning to promote critical thinking among prospective teachers of physic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(1), 43-56.

Prayogi, S., Yuanita, L. & Wasis. (2017). Critical-Inquiry-Based-Learning: Model of learning to promote critical thinking ability of pre-service teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 947: 1-6, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012013

Prayogi, S. & Asy’ari, M. (2013). Implementasi model PBL (Problem Based Learning) n meningkatkan hasil belajar dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Prisma Sains, 1(1), 79-87.

Rodger, W. B., Joseph, A. T., April, G., Pamela, V. S., Janet, C. P., Anne, W. & Nancy L. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Report by Science Education National Institutes of Health.

Safdar, M., Shah, I., Rifat, Q., Afzal, T., Iqbal, A., Malik, R. H. & Wing, C. (2014). Pre-labs as advance organizers to facilitate meaningful learning in the physical science laboratory. Middle Eastern & African Journal of Educational Research, 7, 30-43.

Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P. & Patrick, H. (2008). Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten. Science Education, 92(5), 868-908.

Shah, I. (2004). Making university laboratory work in chemistry more effective. Doctoral Dissertation. Glasgow: Glasgow University, Scotland.

Thompson, C. (2011). Critical thinking across the curriculum: Process over output. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(9), 1-7.

Wahyudi, Verawati, N. N. S. P., Ayub, S. & Prayogi, S. (2019). The effect of scientific creativity in inquiry learning to promote critical thinking ability of prospective teacher. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14 (14), 122-131.

Wahyudi, Verawati, N. N. S. P., Ayub, S. & Prayogi, S. (2019). Development of inquiry-creative-process learning model to promote critical thinking ability of physics prospective teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1108, 1-6. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012005

Webb, M. E., Little, D. R., Cropper, S. J., & Roze, K. (2017). The contributions of convergent thinking, divergent thinking, and schizotypy to solving insight and noninsight problems. Thinking & Reasoning, 2017, 1-24. doi:10.1080/13546783.2017.1295105




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2020-021-pray

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 


Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS)
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (19/05/2010 n. 278)
Online ISSN 2037-7924 - Print ISSN 2037-7932

Research Laboratory on Didactics and Evaluation - Department of Education - "Roma Tre" University


Executive Editor: Gaetano Domenici - Managing  Editor: Valeria Biasci
Editorial Board: Giuditta Alessandrini - Eleftheria Argyropoulou - Massimo Baldacci - Joao Barroso - Richard Bates - Christofer Bezzina - Paolo Bonaiuto - Lucia Boncori - Pietro Boscolo - Sara Bubb  - Carlo Felice Casula - Jean-Émile Charlier - Lucia Chiappetta Cajola - Carmela Covato - Jean-Louis Derouet - Peter Early - Franco Frabboni - Constance Katz - James Levin - Pietro Lucisano  - Roberto Maragliano - Romuald Normand - Michael Osborne - Donatella Palomba - Michele Pellerey - Clotilde Pontecorvo - Vitaly V. Rubtzov - Jaap Scheerens - Noah W. Sobe - Francesco Susi - Giuseppe Spadafora - Pat Thomson
Editorial Staff: Fabio Alivernini - Guido Benvenuto - Anna Maria Ciraci - Massimiliano Fiorucci - Luca Mallia - Massimo Margottini - Giovanni Moretti - Carla Roverselli 
Editorial Secretary:
Nazarena Patrizi