Email this article Studio pilota del questionario sulle strategie di lettura «Dimmi come leggi» per il triennio della scuola secondaria di secondo grado e studenti universitari
Abstract
The study presents the factorial validity, using graphic organizers, controlling the process of the version of the questionnaire on reading strategies, «Tell me How to Read», aimed at the students of upper secondary school and university students. The dimensions investigated correspond to the 7 strategies already tested in the previous versions (lower secondary and primary school, Castellana, 2018, 2020a): identifying reading purposes, activating previous knowledge, making predictions, selecting main information, using graphic organizers and a scale on the self-perception of the difficulties. The new questionnaire consisting of 82 items, was linguistically revised and items that investigate more complex levels of the reading process were added. It was administered to a convenience sample of 543 students, attending the fourth and fifth grades of upper secondary school and Ist-IIIrd year students of the Sapienza University of Rome and Parma. The factor analysis of the questionnaire confirmed the 7 dimensional structure. The questionnaire reduced to 53 items was used within the OFA Italian course of the Department of Psychology at Sapienza University, as an instrument for metacognitive self-assessment of reading and as support for teaching understanding. The scores obtained by the students (99) on the QSL were correlated with the scores of the final test of the course. The value of correlation found between the tests and questionnaire is significant and equal to .377.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ambel, M. (2006). Quel che ho capito. Comprensione dei testi, verifica e valutazione. Roma: Carocci.
Borkowski, J. G., & Muthukrishna, N. (2011). Didattica metacognitiva: Come insegnare strategie efficaci di apprendimento. Trento: Erickson.
Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of meta-cognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Brown, A. L., Armbruster, B. B., & Baker, L. (1986). The role of metacognition in reading and studying. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Read-ing comprehension: From research to practice (pp. 49-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Calvani, A. (2009). Teorie dell'istruzione e carico cognitivo. Trento: Erickson.
Castellana, G. (2018). Dimmi come leggi. Questionario e itinerari didattici sulle strategie di lettura per la scuola secondaria di primo grado. Milano: LED Edizioni.
Castellana, G. (2020a). Validazione per la scuola primaria del questionario sulle strategie di lettura «Dimmi come leggi». In Le Società per la società. Ricerca, scenari, emergenze. Atti del Convegno Internazionale SIRD, SIPES, SIREM, SIEMeS (pp. 264-272). Lecce: Pensa MultiMedia.
Castellana, G. (2020b). Insegnare ad apprendere a leggere. Un modello di ricerca formazione nella scuola secondaria di primo grado. Roma: Armando.
Castellana, G., & Corsini, C. (2018). Valutazione formativa vs accountability. L'impiego del Valore Aggiunto nella ricerca-formazione. Lifelong Lifewide Learning, 14(31), 56-78.
Castellana, G., & Rossi, L. (2020). La didattica delle abilità linguistiche all'università. Strategie di lettura e scrittura di riassunti. In Dal testo al testo. Lettura, comprensione e produzione. Atti del III Convegno ASLI scuola. http://www.asli-scuola.it/index.php/formazione-docenti/convegni/iii-convegno-asli-scuola/abstract-iii-cas
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332. https://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/128
https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
Colombo, A., Cortellini, D., & Sabatino, M. (1989). «Non sanno leggere». La comprensione di testi non letterari nel biennio. In AA.VV., Come si legge un testo (pp. 227-297), a cura di M. L. Altieri Biagi. Milano: Mursia.
Cornoldi, C., & Caponi, B. (1991). Memoria e metacognizione. Attività didattiche per imparare a ricordare. Trento: Erickson.
Corsini, C. (2018). Inclusione e culture valutative. In S. Polenghi, M. Fiorucci, & L. Agostinetto (Eds.), Diritti, cittadinanza, inclusione (pp. 85-94). Lecce: Pensa MultiMedia.
Cronbach, L. J. (1980). Our ninety-five thesis. In L. J. Cronbach (Ed.), Toward re-form of program evaluation (pp. 25-34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (1991). Lettura e metacognizione. Trento: Erickson.
De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (1995). La comprensione del testo. Modelli teorici e programmi di intervento. Torino: UTET.
De Cesare, A. M. (2011). Testi espositivi. In G. Berruto & P. D'Achille, Enciclopedia dell'italiano. Roma: Treccani. https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/testi-espositivi_%28Enciclopedia-dell%27Italiano%29/
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. London - New York: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522
Hendrickson, A. E., & White, P. O. (1964). Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17(1), 65-70.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1964.tb00244.x
Intraversato, A. (2012). La comprensione della lettura tra abilità e conoscenze enciclopediche. Roma: Nuova Cultura.
IRA - International Reading Association (2003). Teaching all children to read: The roles of the reading specialist. A position statement of the International Reading Association. Newark, DE: IRA.
IRA - International Reading Association (2007). Teaching reading well: A synthesis of the International Reading Association's research on teacher preparation for reading instruction. Newark, DE: IRA.
Jacobs, J., & Paris, S. (1984). The benefits of informed instruction for children's reading awareness and comprehension skills. Child Development, 55, 2083-2093.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1129781
Jacobs, J., & Paris. S. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 255-278.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2203&4_4
Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187-200.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289233
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163-182.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163 - PMid:3375398
Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Strategies of comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Lucisano, P. (a cura di). (1989). Lettura e comprensione. Torino: Loecher.
Lumbelli, L. (2009). La comprensione come problema. Bari: Laterza.
Markman, E. M. (1978). Realizing that you don't understand: A preliminary investigation. Child Development, 48, 986-992.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1977.tb01257.x
Markman, E. M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 61-84). New York: Academic Press.
Mayer, R., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
Mc Ewan, E. (2004). Seven strategies of highly effective readers: Using cognitive research to boost K-8 achievements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72-103.
https://doi.org/10.2307/747349
NICHD - National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). National Reading Panel. http://-www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/documents/report.pdf
OECD - Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2009a). PISA 2009. Technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Palincsar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239-1252.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1239
Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 293-316.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90018-8
Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. J. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. 3 (pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
https://doi.org/10.2307/358808
RAND (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Reading Study Group. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_re-ports/2005/MR1465.pdf
Rapporto Eurydice (2011). Insegnare a leggere in Europa. Contesti, politiche e pratiche. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/Eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/130IT.pdf
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181-221.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066002181
Sabatini, F., Casomodeca, C., & De Santis, C. (2011). Sistema e testo. Dalla grammatica valenziale all'esperienza dei testi. Torino: Loescher.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research, 55, 227-268.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543055002227
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2021-023-calu
Copyright (©) 2021 Giusi Castellana, Pietro Lucisano – Editorial format and Graphical layout: copyright (©) LED Edizioni Universitarie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS)
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (19/05/2010 n. 278)
Online ISSN 2037-7924 - Print ISSN 2037-7932
Research Laboratory on Didactics and Evaluation - Department of Education - "Roma Tre" University
Executive Editor: Gaetano Domenici - Associate Executive Editor & Managing Editor: Valeria Biasci
Editorial Board: Eleftheria Argyropoulou - Massimo Baldacci - Joao Barroso - Richard Bates - Christofer Bezzina - Paolo Bonaiuto - Lucia Boncori - Pietro Boscolo - Sara Bubb - Carlo Felice Casula - Jean-Émile Charlier - Lucia Chiappetta Cajola - Carmela Covato - Jean-Louis Derouet - Peter Early - Franco Frabboni - Constance Katz - James Levin - Pietro Lucisano - Roberto Maragliano - Romuald Normand - Michael Osborne - Donatella Palomba - Michele Pellerey - Clotilde Pontecorvo - Vitaly V. Rubtzov - Jaap Scheerens - Noah W. Sobe - Francesco Susi - Giuseppe Spadafora - Pat Thomson
Editorial Staff: Fabio Alivernini - Guido Benvenuto - Anna Maria Ciraci - Massimiliano Fiorucci - Luca Mallia - Massimo Margottini - Giovanni Moretti - Carla Roverselli
Editorial Secretary:Nazarena Patrizi
© 2001 LED Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto