Led On Line
Presentazione - About us
Novita' - What's new
E-Journals
E-books
Lededizioni Home Page Ricerca - Search
Catalogo - Catalogue
Per contattarci - Contacts
Per gli Autori - For the Authors
Statistiche - Statistics
Cookie Policy
Privacy Policy

Motor Creativity and Self-Efficacy in Young Gymnasts: Expertise Differences

Roberta De Pero, Luca Mallia, Martina Capitani, Patrizia Scibinetti

Abstract


The expression of original and functional motor actions (e.g. motor creativity) has been associated to various self-concept constructs such as self-efficacy (Richard et al., 2018). The aim of the present study was to investigate how motor creativity and self-efficacy could change according to gymnastics practice years. Thirty-five young gymnasts (N = 17 élite; N = 18 recreational) participated in the study. Gymnasts performed the motor creativity tests (Bertsch, 1983) and they were administered the self-efficacy in physical activities inventory (Morano et al., 2019). Analyses of variance showed significant differences in all creativity dimensions (i.e. fluency, flexibility and originality) with flexibility showing the lowest differences between groups. Furthermore, élite gymnasts showed higher values both in bench than in floor and hoop creativity tasks, than recreational group. Significant differences between groups emerged in self-efficacy levels too, with élite gymnasts showing higher values than recreational gymnasts. Finally, creativity and selfefficacy resulted more related in élite gymnasts than in recreational ones. Motor creativity interventions could help both élite and recreational gymnasts to perform a greater variety and adaptability of movement solutions to achieve a task goal also in advancing technical expertise.


Keywords


Children; Expertise; Gymnastics; Motor creativity; Self-efficacy.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adolph, K. E., & Hoch, J. E. (2019). Motor development: Embodied, embedded, enculturated, and enabling. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 141-164.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102836

Ashford, S., Edmunds, J., & French, D. P. (2010). What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. British Psychological Society, 15, 265-288.

https://doi.org/10.1348/135910709X461752

Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Assessment Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158-163.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190509554310

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447-457.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4

Bertsch, J. (1983). Le créativité motrice. Son evaluation et son optimisation dans la pédagogie des situations motrices a l'école. Manuel de tests [Motor creativity. Evaluation and optimization in the pedagogy of physical education. Test manual]. Paris: INSEP.

Bournelli, P., Makri, A., & Mylonas, K. (2009). Motor creativity and self-concept. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 104-110.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633657

Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Shuttleworth, R., & Araújo, D. (2020). Ecological dynamics and transfer from practice to performance in sport. In A. M. Williams & N. Hodges (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice. London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351189750-18

Cleland, F. E., & Gallahue, D. L. (1993). Young children's divergent movement ability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77(2), 535-544.

https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1993.77.2.535

Davids, K., Handford, C., & Williams, M. (1994). The natural physical alternative to cognitive theories of motor behaviour: An invitation for interdisciplinary research in sports science? Journal of Sports Sciences, 12(6), 495-528.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02640419408732202

Domínguez, A., Díaz-Pereira, M. P., & Martínez-Vidal, A. (2015). The evolution of motor creativity during primary education. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 10(2), 583-591.

https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2015.102.05

Dunton, G. F., Schneider, M., & Cooper, D. M. (2007). An investigation of psychosocial factors related to changes in physical activity and fitness among female adolescents. Psychology and Health, 22, 929-944.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320601124915

Ercis, S. (2018). Prediction of élite male trampolines' performance based on the selected psychological capabilities. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6, 19-24.

https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i4a.3210

Feltz, D. L., Short, S. E., & Sullivan, P. J. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport. Human Kinetics.

https://doi.org/10.5040/9781718206625

Fleith, D. S., Renzulli, J. S., & Westberg, K. L. (2002). Effects of a creativity training program on divergent thinking abilities and self-concept in monolingual and bilingual classrooms. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 373-386.

https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_8

Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). Educating which creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 25-32.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.11.006

Gomez-Paloma, F., Rio, L., & D'Anna, C. (2014). Physical self-efficacy in women's artistic gymnastic between recreational and competitive level. Catholic University Slovakia, Faculty of Education, Department of Physical Education and Sport.

https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2014.9.Proc1.18

Grammatikopoulos, V., Gregoriadis, A., & Zachopoulou, E. (2012). Acknowledging the role of motor domain in creativity in early childhood education. In O. N. Saracho (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on research in creativity in early childhood education (pp. 159-176). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Griggs, G., & McGregor, D. (2012). Scaffolding and mediating for creativity: Suggestions from reflecting on practice in order to develop the teaching and learning of gymnastics. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36(2), 225-241.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.614929

Lubart, T., & Guignard, J. H. (2004). The generality-specificity of creativity: A multivariate approach. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 43-56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-004

Malinin, L. H. (2019). How radical is embodied creativity? Implications of 4E approaches for creativity research and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2372.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02372

Marmeleira, J., & Duarte Santos, G. (2019). Do not neglect the body and action: The emergence of embodiment approaches to understanding human development. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 126(3), 410-445.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512519834389

McAuley, E., & Blissmer, B. (2000). Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 28, 85-88.

Memmert, D. (2015). Teaching tactical creativity in sport: Research and practice. New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315797618

Morano, M., Bortoli, L., Ruiz, M. C., Vitali, F., & Robazza C. (2019). Self-efficacy and enjoyment of physical activity in children: Factorial validity of two pictorial scales. PeerJ, 7, e7402.

https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7402

Orth, D., Van der Kamp, J., Memmert, D., & Savelsbergh, G. J. P. (2017). Creative motor actions as emerging from movement variability. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01903

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01903

Plucker, J., & Beghetto, R. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153-167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-009

Price, L. (2008). Creativity and gymnastics. In J. Lavin, Creative approaches to physical education (pp. 71-94). New York: Routledge.

Richard, V., Lebeaua, J. C., Becker, F., Inglis, E., & Tenenbaum, G. (2018). Do more creative people adapt better? An investigation into the association between creativity and adaptation. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 38, 80-89.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.06.001

Richard, V., Holder, D., & Cairney, J. (2021). Creativity in motion: Examining the creative potential system and enriched movement activities as a way to ignite it. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 690-710.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.690710

Santos, S., Memmert, D., Sampaio, J., & Leite, N. (2016). The spawns of creative behavior in team sports: A creativity developmental framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-14.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01282

Santos, S., & Monteiro, D. (2021). Uncovering the role of motor performance and creative thinking on sports creativity in primary school-aged children. Creativity Research Journal, 33, 1-15.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1843125

Scholz, U., Doña, B. G., Sud, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(3), 242.

https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242

Scibinetti, P. (2019). Creatività motoria. Come svilupparla in età evolutiva e anziana [Motor creativity. How to promote it during development and aging]. Perugia: Calzetti & Mariucci.

Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 87-98.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of Creativity, 1, 3-15.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916.003

Theodorakou, K., & Zervas, Y. (2003). The effects of the creative movement teaching method and the traditional teaching method on elementary school children's self-esteem. Sport, Education and Society, 8(1), 91-104.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1357332032000050088

Tocci, N., Scibinetti, P., & Zelli, A. (2004). Age and gender differences in motor creativity among Italian elementary school children. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 46(1), 89-104.

Tocci, N., Scibinetti, P., Mazzoli , E., Mavilidi, M. F., Masci, I., Schmidt, M., & Pesce, C. (2022). Giving ideas some legs or legs some ideas? Children's motor creativity is enhanced by physical activity enrichment: Direct and mediated paths. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806065

Torrance, E. P. (1988). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.

Torrents, C., Castaner, M., Dinusova, M., & Anguera, M. T. (2010). Discovering new ways of moving: observational analysis of motor creativity while dancing contact improvisation and the influence of the partner. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 44, 45-61.

https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01325.x

Wyrick, W. (1968). The development of a test of motor creativity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 19, 756-765.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1968.10616608

Zachopolou, E., & Makri, A. (2005). A developmental perspective of divergent movement ability in early young children. Early Child Development and Care, 175, 85-95.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443042000230401




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2022-026-depe

Copyright (©) 2022 patrizia scibinetti – Editorial format and Graphical layout: copyright (©) LED Edizioni Universitarie

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 


Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS)
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (19/05/2010 n. 278)
Online ISSN 2037-7924 - Print ISSN 2037-7932

Research Laboratory on Didactics and Evaluation - Department of Education - "Roma Tre" University


Executive Editor: Gaetano Domenici - Associate Executive Editor & Managing  Editor: Valeria Biasci
Editorial Board: Eleftheria Argyropoulou - Massimo Baldacci - Joao Barroso - Richard Bates - Christofer Bezzina - Paolo Bonaiuto - Lucia Boncori - Pietro Boscolo - Sara Bubb  - Carlo Felice Casula - Jean-Émile Charlier - Lucia Chiappetta Cajola - Carmela Covato - Jean-Louis Derouet - Peter Early - Franco Frabboni - Constance Katz - James Levin - Pietro Lucisano  - Roberto Maragliano - Romuald Normand - Michael Osborne - Donatella Palomba - Michele Pellerey - Clotilde Pontecorvo - Vitaly V. Rubtzov - Jaap Scheerens - Noah W. Sobe - Francesco Susi - Giuseppe Spadafora - Pat Thomson
Editorial Staff: Fabio Alivernini - Guido Benvenuto - Anna Maria Ciraci - Massimiliano Fiorucci - Luca Mallia - Massimo Margottini - Giovanni Moretti - Carla Roverselli 
Editorial Secretary:
Nazarena Patrizi 


Referee List


© 2001 LED Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto