Led On Line
Presentazione - About us
Novita' - What's new
E-Journals
E-books
Lededizioni Home Page Ricerca - Search
Catalogo - Catalogue
Per contattarci - Contacts
Per gli Autori - For the Authors
Statistiche - Statistics
Cookie Policy
Privacy Policy

Metodo e strategie di studio: cosa sanno gli studenti? Un’indagine all’Università di Trento

Veronica Cembrani, Anna Serbati, Claudio Mulatti

Abstract


Study Methods And Learning Strategies: What Do Students Know? A Survey At The University Of Trento.

How do students study? What do students know about study methods and learning strategies? Recent research has shown that most students rely on ineffective study methods. This behavior could be ascribed to a limited knowledge about learning strategies: students might rely on ineffective study methods because they have erroneous views about which learning strategies are effective. The aim of our research has been to further address this topic at the University of Trento. Here, we present and discuss the results of a survey study that investigates the students’ knowledge of some common learning strategies, the beliefs about their utility, and how much students intended to use them during the semester. Our results confirm that students are often not aware of which learning strategies are most effective. Furthermore, our data suggests that even when students do know how they should study, they do not always reflect it in their study activities. These conclusions requires appropriate considerations and intervention in educational contexts.


Keywords


Intended strategy use; Learning strategies; Learning strategy effectiveness; Learning strategy knowledge; Study methods.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ariel, R., & Karpicke, J. D. (2018). Improving self-regulated learning with a retrieval practice intervention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24(1), 43-56.

https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000133

PMid:28604013

Bahrick, H. P. (1979). Maintenance of knowledge: Questions about memory we forgot to ask. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 296-230.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.296

Blasiman, R. N., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2017). The what, how much, and when of study strategies: Comparing intended versus actual study behavior. Memory, 25(6), 784-792.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1221974

PMid:27561889

Carrier, L. M. (2003). College students' choices of study strategies. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 96, 54-56.

https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.96.1.54

PMid:12705510

Cembrani, V., & Mulatti, C. (in preparation). Educating students to successfully study: Is it possible?

Cecchinato, G., & Foschi, L. C. (2017). Flipping the roles: Analysis of a university course where students become co-creators of curricula. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 22(5), 1-9.

Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bullettin, 132, 354-380.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354

PMid:16719566

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingh, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

PMid:26173288

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.

Einstein, G. O., Mullet, H. G., & Harrison, T. L. (2012). The testing effect: Illustrating a fundamental concept and changing study strategies. Teaching of Psychology, 39, 190-193.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628312450432

Gurung, R. A. R. (2005). How do students really study (and does it matter)? Teaching of Psychology, 32, 239-241.

Gurung, R. A. R., Weidert, J., & Jeske, A. (2010). Focusing on how students study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10, 28-35.

Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 126-134.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0181-y

PMid:22083626

Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17(4), 471-479.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210802647009

PMid:19358016

Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 187-194.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.187

PMid:15755238

Kornell, N. (2009). Optimising learning using flashcards: More effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1297-1317.

https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1537

Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 219-224.

https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194055

PMid:17694904

McCabe, J. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition, 39, 462-476.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0035-2

PMid:21264604

McCabe, J. A., Friedman-Wheeler, D. G., Davis, S. R., & Pearce, J. (2020). «SET» for success: Targeted instruction in learning strategies and behavior change in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 48(3), 257-268.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320979865

Morehead, K., Rhodes, M. G., & DeLozier, S. (2015). Instructor and student knowledge of study strategies. Memory, 24(2), 1-15.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2014.1001992

PMid:25625188

Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: How much is enough? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 283-302.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023956

PMid:21707204

Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2005). Rereading effects depend upon the time of test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 70-80.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.70

Roediger, H., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x

PMid:16507066

Rothkopf, E. Z. (1968). Textual constraint as a function of repeated inspection. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 20-25.

https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025378

Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Montgomery, C. (2013). Assessment for learning in higher education. London: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818268

PMid:22682405 PMCid:PMC3411494

Susser, J. A., & McCabe, J. (2013). From the lab to the dorm room: Metacognitive awareness and use of spaced study. Instructional Science, 41(2), 345-363.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-012-9231-8

Taraban, R., Maki, W. S., & Rynearson, K. (1999). Measuring study time distributions: Implications for designing computer-based courses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31(2), 263-269.

https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207718

PMid:10495808

Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Wiseheart, M., Kupper-Tetzel, C. E., Weston, T., Kim, A. S. N., Kapler, I. V., & Foot, V. (2019). Enhancing the quality of student learning using distributed practice. In J. Dunlosky & K. A. Rawson (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of cognition and education (pp. 550-584). New York: Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235631.023

Wissman, K. T., Rawson, K. A., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). How and when do students use flashcards? Memory, 20, 568-579.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.687052

PMid:22671698

Yang, C., Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2018). Enhancing learning and retrieval of new information: A review of the forward testing effect. npj Science of Learning, 3(8), 1-8.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-018-0024-y

PMid:30631469 PMCid:PMC6220253




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2023-027-cemb

Copyright (©) 2023 Veronica Cembrani, Anna Serbati, Claudio Mulatti – Editorial format and Graphical layout: copyright (©) LED Edizioni Universitarie

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

 


Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS)
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (19/05/2010 n. 278)
Online ISSN 2037-7924 - Print ISSN 2037-7932

Research Laboratory on Didactics and Evaluation - Department of Education - "Roma Tre" University


Executive Editor: Gaetano Domenici - Associate Executive Editor & Managing  Editor: Valeria Biasci
Editorial Board: Eleftheria Argyropoulou - Massimo Baldacci - Joao Barroso - Richard Bates - Christofer Bezzina - Paolo Bonaiuto - Lucia Boncori - Pietro Boscolo - Sara Bubb  - Carlo Felice Casula - Jean-Émile Charlier - Lucia Chiappetta Cajola - Carmela Covato - Jean-Louis Derouet - Peter Early - Franco Frabboni - Constance Katz - James Levin - Pietro Lucisano  - Roberto Maragliano - Romuald Normand - Michael Osborne - Donatella Palomba - Michele Pellerey - Clotilde Pontecorvo - Vitaly V. Rubtzov - Jaap Scheerens - Noah W. Sobe - Francesco Susi - Giuseppe Spadafora - Pat Thomson
Editorial Staff: Fabio Alivernini - Guido Benvenuto - Anna Maria Ciraci - Massimiliano Fiorucci - Luca Mallia - Massimo Margottini - Giovanni Moretti - Carla Roverselli 
Editorial Secretary:
Nazarena Patrizi 


Referee List


© 2001 LED Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto