Led On Line
Presentazione - About us
Novita' - What's new
E-Journals
E-books
Lededizioni Home Page Ricerca - Search
Catalogo - Catalogue
Per contattarci - Contacts
Per gli Autori - For the Authors
Statistiche - Statistics
Cookie Policy
Privacy Policy

Estonian School System Strategic Leadership «Effects» on School Performance

Hasso Kukemelk

Abstract


All Estonian comprehensive and vocational schools and kindergartens, introduced quality management principles based on the «European Foundation for Quality Management» (EFQM) model of excellence starting from September 2006. This study was designed to identify how school improvements towards learning organisations are managed according to the principal’s opinion. The questionnaire was developed on the basis of EFQM excellence model criteria incuding five enablers (leadership, policy and strategy, people management, resources and processes) and four results (people satisfaction, customer satisfaction, impact on society, and business results). A five-point «Likert scale» was used in compiling the questionnaire, which was administered as an electronic survey (e-formular). All principals of Estonian elementary and secondary schools were asked to respond (63% answered) between November 2009 and February 2010. A total number of 327 school principals responded to the questionnaire. The sample was representative for Estonia and the tool was valid for measurement (Cronbach Alpha > 0.89 in major blocks of the instrument: strategic management, educational processes in school, assessment of school outcomes). The collected data were correlated to national educational statistics (state examination results, further studies, school drop-out, etc.). Average evaluations of school leadership statements by principals were extremely positive. The study indicates that after a three-year implementation of a new managerial system, principals use new terminology but most schools are continuing to run the previous system. The main points of the study are provided with a statistical overview and some recommendations for school development are offered.


Keywords


Assessment of school outcomes; Educational process management; Quality management; Self-evaluation; Strategic management; Auto-valutazione; Gestione dei processi educativi; Gestione della qualità; Gestione strategica; Valutazione dei risultati scolastici

Full Text:

PDF

References


Avis, J. (2006). Improvement through research: Policy science or policy scholarship. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 11(1), 107-114.

Bore, A., & Wright, N. (2009). The wicked and complex in education: Developing a transdisciplinary perspective for policy formulation, implementation and professional practice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(3), 241-256.

Bosker, R. J., & Scheerens, J. (2000). Publishing school performance data. European Education, 32(3), 12-30.

Deming, W. E. (2000). The new economics for industry, government, education (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Dempster, N., Freakley, M., & Parry, L. (2001). The ethical climate of public schooling under New Public Management. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(1), 1-12.

Dolton, P., & Newson, D. (2003). The relationship between teacher turnover and school performance. London Review of Education, 1(2), 132-140.

Edmund, M. (2008). The architect of quality. Quality Progress, 41(4), 20-25.

EFQM homepage: http://www.efqm.org/en/tabid/392/default.aspx (consulted 25/05/2012).

Hays, S. W., & Kearney, R. C. (1997). Riding the crest of a wave: The national performance review and public management reform. International Journal of Public Administration, 20(1), 11-40.

Hendriks, M. A., & Scheerens, J. (2013). School leadership effects revisited: A review of empirical studies guided by indirect-effect models. School Leadership and Management, 33(4), 373-394.

Kalin, J., & Zuljan, M. V. (2007). Teacher perceptions of the goals of effective school reform and their own role in it. Educational Studies, 33(2), 163-175.

Kukemelk, H., Lillemaa, T., & Tondi, J. (2011). Teachers professional involvement in creating a general learning environment in Estonian schools. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 47-51.

Lindborg, H. (2005). From quality professional to teacher. Quality Progress, 38(2), 76-77.

MacBeath, J., & Townsend, T. (2011). Leadership and learning: Paradox, paradigms and principles. In T. Townsend & J. MacBeath (Eds.), International handbook of leadership for learning (pp. 1-28). Dordrecht - Heidelberg - London - New York: Springer.

Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey & Co.

Ngware, M. W., Wamukuru, D. K., & Odebero, S. O. (2006). Total quality management in secondary schools in Kenya: Extent of practice. Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 14(4), 339-362.

Safakli, O. V., & San, E. (2007). The appropriateness of principal, teacher and student elements to TQM in learning environment: Case of secondary school in Northern Cyprus. Journal of Transnational Management, 12(3), 39-52.

Senge, P. (2001). Schools that learn. New York: Doubleday.

Steed, C., Maslow, D., & Mazaletskaya, A. (2005). The EFQM excellence model developing quality management: A British-Russian journey. Higher Education in Europe, 30(3-4), 307-319.

Sun, H., Creemers, B. P. M., & De Jong, R. (2007). Contextual factors and effective school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18, 93-122.

Türk, K., Haldma, T., Kukemelk, H., Ploom, K., Irs, R., & Pukkonen, L. (2011). Üldharidus- ja kutsekoolide tulemuslikkus ja seda mõjutavad tegurid. Research report in Estonian. Tartu: Tartu Ülikool.

Woods, P. A., & Levačić, R. (2002). Raising school performance in the league tables (Part 2): Barriers to responsiveness in three disadvantaged schools. British Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 227-247.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2015-011-kuke



 


Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS)
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (19/05/2010 n. 278)
Online ISSN 2037-7924 - Print ISSN 2037-7932

Research Laboratory on Didactics and Evaluation - Department of Education - "Roma Tre" University


Executive Editor: Gaetano Domenici - Managing  Editor: Valeria Biasci
Editorial Board: Giuditta Alessandrini - Eleftheria Argyropoulou - Massimo Baldacci - Joao Barroso - Richard Bates - Christofer Bezzina - Paolo Bonaiuto - Lucia Boncori - Pietro Boscolo - Sara Bubb  - Carlo Felice Casula - Jean-Émile Charlier - Lucia Chiappetta Cajola - Carmela Covato - Jean-Louis Derouet - Peter Early - Franco Frabboni - Constance Katz - James Levin - Pietro Lucisano  - Roberto Maragliano - Romuald Normand - Michael Osborne - Donatella Palomba - Michele Pellerey - Clotilde Pontecorvo - Vitaly V. Rubtzov - Jaap Scheerens - Noah W. Sobe - Francesco Susi - Giuseppe Spadafora - Pat Thomson
Editorial Staff: Fabio Alivernini - Guido Benvenuto - Anna Maria Ciraci - Massimiliano Fiorucci - Luca Mallia - Massimo Margottini - Giovanni Moretti - Carla Roverselli 
Editorial Secretary:
Nazarena Patrizi