Led On Line
Presentazione - About us
Novita' - What's new
E-Journals
E-books
Lededizioni Home Page Ricerca - Search
Catalogo - Catalogue
Per contattarci - Contacts
Per gli Autori - For the Authors
Statistiche - Statistics
Cookie Policy
Privacy Policy

Ethics for the Living World Alternative Methods and New Strategies for The Protection of Nonhuman Animals

Susanna Penco, Rosagemma Ciliberti

Abstract


The use of animals in laboratories is a controversial issue involving much dispute between the researchers who support animal experimentation and those who are in favor of its abolishment. The former, whilst criticizing the emotional behavior of those who oppose it, consider experimentation on animals unavoidable, whereas the latter criticize animal experiments and the underlying logic as erroneous considering its methods unscientific and therefore misleading. This paper stems from the idea of researching into possible ways of developing or improving new alternative strategies for animal experimentation by finding adequate solutions beyond dogmatic opposition in the context of the current European Directive 2010/63/EU (the main reference point for the experimentation on animals) for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. More specifically the paper aims at offering the readers a working proposal, while duly respecting the protocol for the post mortem donation of their own corpses for the purposes of study and research. As we believe diseases need to be cured and not only treated, we are advocating post mortem studies on organs which could lead to the discovery of the causes of unknown etiological pathologies. The commitment to the implementation of constantly new and innovative alternatives concerning animal experimentation is right and proper, especially in the light of the enormous debt which the Italian National Bioethics Committee stated that mankind has towards nonhuman living beings.


Keywords


Animal experiments; animal ethics; animal use; alternative methods; ethics committee; post mortem body donations; human tissue and human organ donation; corpse didactics; animal protection; multiple sclerosis.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbott, Alison. 2005. “Animal Testing: More than A Cosmetic Change.” Nature 438: 144-146. doi:10.1038/438144a.

Balls, Michael. 2012. “The Conflict over Animal Experimentation: Is The Field of Battle Changing? “ Alternatives To Laboratory Animals 40 (4): 189-191.

Battaglia, Luisella. 2010. Bioetica senza dogmi, Soveria Mannelli (CZ): Rubbettino.

Bernardesca, Enzo, and Howard I. Maibach. 1988. “Racial Differences in Sodium Lauryl Sulphate Indiced Cutaneus Irritation: Black and White.” Contact Dermatitis 18 (2): 65-70.

Ciliberti, Rosagemma. 2008. “Considerazioni e proposte per la formulazione di linee guida per il funzionamento di Comitati Etici nella sperimentazione animale.” In Manuale di Bioetica per La Sperimentazione Clinica e I Comitati Etici, a cura di Luisa Maria Borgia, 253-264. Torino: C.G. Edizioni Medico Scientifiche.

Comitato Nazionale per La Bioetica. 2009. “Metodologie Alternative, Comitati Etici e L’ Obiezione di Coscienza alla Sperimentazione Animale.” Governo Italiano. Last modified December 18, 2009. Accessed December 6, 2012. http://www.governo.it/bioetica/pareri_abstract/met_alltenative_sper_animale_18122009.pdf.

Couzin, Jennifer. 2003. “Estrogen Research. The Great Estrogen Conundrum.” Science 302 (5648): 1136-1138. doi:10.1126/science.302.5648.1136.

Fraga, Mario F., Esteban Ballestar, Maria F. Paz, Santiago Ropero, Fernando Setien, Maria L. Ballestar, Damia Heine-Suñer, Juan C. Cigudosa, Miguel Urioste, Javier Benitez, Manuel Boix-Chornet, Abel Sanchez-Aguilera, Charlotte Ling, Emma Carlsson, Pernille Poulsen, Allan Vaag, Zarko Stephan, Tim D. Spector, Yue-Zhong Wu, Christoph Plass, and Manel Esteller. 2005. “Epigenetic Differences Arise During the Lifetime of Monozygotic Twins.” Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America 102 (30): 10604-10609. doi:10.3410/f.1026838.325377.

Gear, Robert W., Christine Miaskowski, Newton C. Gordon, Steven M. Paul, Philip H. Heller, and Jon D. Levine. 1996. “Kappa-Opioids Produce Significantly Greater Analgesia in Women than in Men.” Nature Medicine 2 (11): 1248-1250. doi:10.1038/nm1196-1248.

Greek, Ray, Annalea Pippus, and Laurence Hansen. 2012. “The Nuremberg Code Subverts Human Health and Safety By Requiring Animal Modeling.” BioMedCentral BMC Medical Ethics 13 (16). doi:10.1186/1472-6939-13-16.

Hackam, Daniel, and Donald Redelmeier. 2006. “Translation of Research Evidence from Animals to Humans.” The Journal of the American Medical Association 296 (14): 1727-1732. doi:10.1001/jama.296.14.1731.

Hartung, Thomas. 2009. “Toxicology for The Twenty-First Century.” Nature 460, 208-212. doi:10.1038/460208a.

Knight, Andrew, Jarrod Bailey, and Jonathan Balcombe. 2006. “Animal Carcinogenicity Studies: Implications for The REACH System.” Alternatives To Laboratory Animals 34 (1): 139-147.

Lindl, Toni, Manfred Voelkel, and Roman Kolar. 2005. “Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research. An Evaluation of the Clinical Relevance of Approved Animal Experimental Projects.” ALTEX Alternatives To Animals Experimentation 22 (3): 143-151.

Lindl, Toni, Manfred Voelkel. 2011. “No Clinical Relevance of Approved Animal Experiments after Seventeen Years.” ALTEX Alternatives To Animals Experimentation 28(3): 242-243.

Magliozzi, Roberta, Owain Howell, Abhilash Vora, Barbara Serafini, Richard Nicholas, Maria Puopolo, Richard Reynolds, and Francesca Aloisi. 2007. “Meningeal B-Cell Follicles in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Associate Early Onset of Desease and Severe Cortical Pathology.” Brain 130 (4): 1089-1104. doi:10.1093/brain/awm038.

Matthews, Robert A.J. 2008. “Medical Progress Depends on Animal Models – Doesn’t It?” Journal of The Royal Society of Medicine 101 (2): 95–98. doi:10.1258/jrsm.2007.070164.

Perel, Pablo, Ian Roberts, Emily Sena, Philipa Wheble, Catherine Briscoe, Peter Sandercock, Malcolm Macleod, Luciano E. Mignini, Pradeep Jayaram, and Khalid S. Khan. 2007. “Comparison of Treatment Effects Between Animal Experiments and Clinical Trials: Systematic Review.” British Medical Journal 334 (7586): 197-200. doi:10.1136/bmj.39048.407928.BE.

Serafini, Barbara, Barbara Rosicarelli, Diego Franciotta, Roberta Magliozzi, Richard Reynolds, Paola Cinque, Laura Andreoni, Pankaj Trivedi, Marco Salvetti, Alberto Faggioni, and Francesca Aloisi. 2007. “Dysregulated Epstein-Barr Virus Infection in The Multiple Sclerosis Brain.” The Journal of Experimental Medicine 204 (12): 2899-2912. doi:10.1084/jem.20071030.

Shanks, Niall, Ray Greek and Jean Greek. 2009. “Are Animal Models Predictive for Humans?” Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 4 (2). doi:10.1186/1747-5341-4-2.

Sriram, Subramanian and Israel Steiner. 2005. “Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis: A Misleading Model of Multiple Sclerosis.” Annals of Neurology 58 (6): 939–945. doi:10.1002/ana.20743.

Staffa, Judy A., Jung Chang, and Lawrence Green. 2002. “Cerivastatin and Reports of Fatal Rhabdomyolysis.” The New England Journal of Medicine 346 (7): 539-540. doi:10.1056/NEJM200202143460721.

Topol, Eric J. 2004. “Failing The Public Health – Rofecoxib, Merck, and The FDA.” New England Journal of Medicine 351: 1707-1709. doi:10.1056/NEJMp048286.

Tzartos, John S., Gulfaraz Khan, Anna Vossenkamper, Mari Cruz-Sabada, Silvia Lonardi, Eseberuo Sefia, Anthony Meager, Androulla Elia, Jaap M. Middeldorp, Mike Clemens, Paul J. Farrell, Gavin Giovannoni, and Ute-Christiane Meier. 2012. “Association of Innate Immune Activation with Latent Epstein-Barr Virus in Active MS Lesions.” Neurology 78 (1): 15-23. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823ed057.

Van der Worp, Bart H., David W. Howells, Emily S. Sena, Michelle J. Porritt, Sarah Rewell, Victoria O’Collins, Malcolm R. Macleod. 2010. “Can Animal Models of Disease Reliably Inform Human Studies?” Plos Medicine 7 (3). doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000245.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/rela-2013-002-penc



Copyright (©) 2018 Susanna Penco, Rosagemma Ciliberti – Editorial format and Graphical layout: copyright (©) LED Edizioni Universitarie




Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (04/05/2012 n. 211)
Online ISSN 2280-9643 - Print ISSN 2283-3196


Executive Editor: Francesco Allegri
Associate Editor: Matteo Andreozzi 
Review Editors: Sofia Bonicalzi - Eleonora Adorni
Editorial Board:
Ralph R. Acampora - Carol J. Adams - Vilma Baricalla - Luisella Battaglia - Rod Bennison - Matthew R. Calarco - Piergiorgio Donatelli - William Grove-Fanning - Serenella Iovino - Luigi Lombardi Vallauri - Christoph Lumer - Joel MacClellan - Dario Martinelli - Roberto Marchesini - Alma Massaro - Serpil Oppermann - Simone Pollo - Paola Sobbrio - Kim Stallwood - Sabrina Tonutti - Jessica Ullrich - Federico Zuolo

Referee List


© 2001 LED Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto