Led On Line
Presentazione - About us
Novita' - What's new
E-Journals
E-books
Lededizioni Home Page Ricerca - Search
Catalogo - Catalogue
Per contattarci - Contacts
Per gli Autori - For the Authors
Statistiche - Statistics
Cookie Policy
Privacy Policy

Boundary Transgressions: the Human-Animal Chimera in Science Fiction

Evelyn Tsitas

Abstract


This paper explores how science fiction writers have used human-animal chimera experiments as the inspiration for creating characters that challenge us to consider what is quintessentially human and what is animal. Since Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) created a manufactured man from parts of dead animals and humans combined, and H.G. Wells wrote about vivisection used to create the Beast Men in The Island of Dr. Moreau in 1896, animal experimentation has been mirrored in science fiction. Xenotransplantation is used with tragic-comic effect in Mikhail Bulgakov’s long banned 1932 novel A Dog’s Heart, and with pathos in Malorie Blackman’s 1997 children’s novel Pig Heart Boy. Shostakovich’s recently resurrected 1932 satiric opera, Orango, explores the results of doctors inseminating female primates with their own sperm. In Vincenzo Natali’s 2009 transgenic science fiction horror film Splice, Dren – the ultimate chimera – is created by scientists Clive and Elsa splicing multiple animal and human DNA. As Donna Haraway predicted in A Manifesto for Cyborgs (1991), “[b]y the late twentieth century […] nothing really convincingly settles the separation of the human and animal”. In investigating the manufactured human-animal chimera as a cyborg, the literary trope of the mad scientist that emerged with Frankenstein is examined.


Keywords


Human-animal studies, human-animal chimeras, science fiction, animal experimentation, Donna Haraway, Mary Shelley, H.G. Wells, Malorie Blackman, Vincenzo Natali, Mikhail Bulgakov

Full Text:

PDF

References


Birke, Lynda and Michael, Mike. 1998, “The Heart Of The Matter: Animal Bodies, Ethics, and Species Boundaries.” Society and Animals, 6 (3): 245-261.

Bennett, D. Scott. 2006. “Chimera and The Continuum of Humanity: Erasing The Line of Constitutional Personhood.” Emory Law Journal, 55, 2: 347-387.

Blackman, Malorie. 1997. Pig Heart Boy. Doubleday.

Bulgakov, Michail Afanas'evič. 1932. A Dog’s Heart. London: Penguin Classics.

Clayton, Jay. 2007. “Victorian Chimeras, or, What Literature Can Contribute to Genetics Policy Today.” New Literary History 38 (3): 569-591.

Danta, Chris. 2012. “The Future will have been animal: Dr Moreau and the aesthetics of monstrosity.” Textual Practice, 26 (4): 687-705.

Duffy, Maureen. 1995. “When the scientist plays the devil.” The Independent (London, England). Accessed April 20, 2013. http://www.questia.com/library/1P2-4701897/science-when-the-scientist-plays-the-devil.

Fahnestock, Jeanne. 2011. Rhetorical Style: The Uses Of Language In Persuasion. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ferreira, Aline. 2008. “Primate Tales: Interspecies Pregnancy and Chimerical Beings.” Science Fiction Studies, 35 (2): 223-237.

Fudge, Erica. 2009. “At The Heart of The Home: An Animal Reading of Mikhail Bulgakov’s The Heart Of A Dog.” Humanimalia: A Journal of Human/Animal Interface. 1 (1): pp. 1-14.

Haraway, Donna. 1991. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology and Socialist Feminism In The 1980s.” In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, written by Donna Haraway, 149-181. London: Free Association.

Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Become Posthuman: Virutal Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

Heffernan, Teresa. 2003. “Bovine Anxieties, Virgin Births, and the Secret of Life.” Cultural Critique, 53: 116-133.

Hinterberger, Amy. 2011. “Human-Animal Chimeras. Discussion paper for The Constitutional Foundations of Bioethics: Cross-National Comparisons.” BioProperty. Accessed April 20, 2013. http://www.bioproperty.ox.ac.uk/index.php/download_file/view/37/97.

Hogle, Jerrold E. ed. 2002. The Cambridge Companion to Gothic Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jackson, Kimberly. 2012. “Splice: The Postmodern Prometheus.” Horror Studies 3 (1): 125-138.

Kirby, David A. 2007. “The Devil in Our DNA: A Brief History of Eugenics in Science Fiction Films.” Literature and Medicine 26 (1): 83-108.

Lodge, David. 2012. A Man of Parts. London: Vintage.

McHugh, Susan. 2006. “The call of the other 0.1 %: genetic aesthetics and the new Moreaus.” AI & Society 20: 63-81.

Mellor, Anne Kostelanetz. 1988. Mary Shelley: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters. New York and London: Routledge.

Rossiianov, Kirill. 2002. “Beyond Species: Il’ya Ivanov and His Experiments on Cross-Breeding Humans with Anthropoid Apes.” Science in Context, 15 (2): 277-316.

Salisbury, J.E. 2011. The Beast Within: Animals in the Middle Ages. 2nd edn. London and New York: Routledge.

Savulescu, Julian. 2003. “Human-Animal Transgenesis and Chimeras Might Be an Expression of Our Humanity.” The American Journal of Bioethics, 3 (3): 22-25.

Schultheiss, Dirk, J. Denil, and Udo Jonas. 1997. “Rejuvenation in the early 20th century.” Andrologia, 29 (6): 351-355.

Shapiro, Kenneth, and Margo DeMello. 2010. “The State Of Human-Animal Studies.” Society and Animals, 18: 307-318.

Shelley, Mary. 1818. Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus. London: Penguin Classics.

Shostakovich, Dmitri. 1932. Orango, libretto by Alexei Nikolayevich Tolstoy and Alexander Osipovich Starchakov, prologue by Gerard McBurney. Semi-staged by Peter Sellars, Esa-Pekka Salonen, and the Los Angeles Philharmonic, December, 2011.

Splice. 2009. Directed by Vincenzo Natali. Warner Bros. Pictures in association with Dark Castle Entertainment, Copperheart Entertainment and Gaumont Production. DVD.

Squier, Susan. 1998. “Interspecies Reproduction: Xenogenic Desire And The Feminist Implications Of Hybrids.” Cultural Studies, 12 (1): 360-381.

Stiles, Anne. 2009. “Literature In Mind: H.G. Wells and the Evolution of the Mad Scientist.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 70 (2): 317-339.

Wolfe, Cary. 2009. What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/rela-2014-002-tsit



Copyright (©) 2018 Evelyn Tsitas – Editorial format and Graphical layout: copyright (©) LED Edizioni Universitarie




Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (04/05/2012 n. 211)
Online ISSN 2280-9643 - Print ISSN 2283-3196


Executive Editor: Francesco Allegri
Associate Editor: Matteo Andreozzi 
Review Editors: Sofia Bonicalzi - Eleonora Adorni
Editorial Board:
Ralph R. Acampora - Carol J. Adams - Vilma Baricalla - Luisella Battaglia - Rod Bennison - Matthew R. Calarco - Piergiorgio Donatelli - William Grove-Fanning - Serenella Iovino - Luigi Lombardi Vallauri - Christoph Lumer - Joel MacClellan - Dario Martinelli - Roberto Marchesini - Alma Massaro - Serpil Oppermann - Simone Pollo - Paola Sobbrio - Kim Stallwood - Sabrina Tonutti - Jessica Ullrich - Federico Zuolo

Referee List


© 2001 LED Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto