1. Amir Anvari A problem for Maximize Presupposition! (Locally)
1. Wm. G. Bennett Subject-Auxiliary inversion in interrogative complex NPs
1. Lisa Bylinina Count lists cross-linguistically vs bootstrapping the counting system
1. Andreea Nicolae, Patrick D. Elliott and Yasutada Sudo Pair-list readings of conjoined singular which-phrases
1. Heidi Harley and Jeffrey Punske Some PP modifiers of NP block relative readings in superlatives
1. Katrin Axel-Tober and Patrick Grosz Even strong evaluatives can occur under negation
1. Peter Arkadiev and Yury Lander Non-quantificational distributive quantifiers in Besleney Kabardian
1. Luka Crnic Projection of supplements in alternatives
1. Matthew Barros Sluiced fragment answers: another puzzle involving islands and ellipsis
1. Theresa Biberauer and Johan Oosthuizen More unbearably light elements? Silent verbs demanding overt complementizers in Afrikaans
1. Jason Kandybowicz and Harold Torrence How why is different: wh-in-situ in
1. Galia Hatav A modification of the “Hey, Wait a Minute” test
1. Teresa Biberauer and Roberta d’Alessandro On the role of gemination in passives: the case of
1. Bridget Copley and Heidi Harley Futurates, directors and have-causatives
1. Maximiliano Guimarães A note on the strong generative capacity of standard Antisymmetry
1. Marco Nicolis On the case marking of PRO in Italian
1. Elissa Flagg Questioning
both: a gap in the theory of antipresupposition
1. Valentina Bianchi An asymmetry
between personal pronouns and other DPs
1. David Adger Focused
1. Gabi Danon Quantification over partitions
2. Elissa Flagg Not just constituent negation
3. Sky Sang-Geun Lee Japanese/Korean possessive verbal nouns as inherently intensional
4. Linton Wang and Eric McCready The indefiniteness effect
1. Boban Arsenijevic Negative
concord in Serbo-Croat APs
1. Relative head surgery
1. A simultaneous perception of things: SOT in Russian
1. Against heterogeneous origins for n't and not
1. R. Amritavalli and Partha
A case distinction between
unaccusative and unergative subjects in Assamese
1. Yves-Ferdinand Bouvier
Some audible effects of a silent operator
1. Tanmoy Bhattacharya
The puzzle of
Bangla Comp-internal clauses
1. Yves-Ferdinand Bouvier
How to passivize French causatives
1. David Gil Rau Indonesian:
a VO language with internally-headed relative clauses
The aim of Snippets is to publish specific remarks that motivate research or that make theoretical points germane to current work. The ideal contribution is brief, self-contained and explicit. One encounters short comments of this kind in earlier literature in linguistics. We feel that there no longer is a forum for them. We want Snippets to help fill that gap.
We will publish notes that contribute to the study of syntax and semantics in generative grammar. The notes are to be brief, self-contained and explicit. They may do any of the following things:
We also encourage submissions that connect psycholinguistic data to theoretical issues. A proposal for a pilot experiment in language acquisition or language processing could make for an excellent snippet.
The earliest Linguistic Inquiry squibs exemplify the kind of remark we would like to publish. Some of them posed unobserved puzzles. For instance, a squib by Postal and Ross in Linguistic Inquiry 1:1 ("A Problem of Adverb Preposing") noted that whether or not we can construe a sentence-initial temporal adverb with an embedded verb depends on the tense of the matrix verb. A squib by Perlmutter and Ross in LI 1:3 ("Relative Clauses with Split Antecedents"), challenging the prevailing analyses of coordination and extraposition, noted that conjoined clauses, neither of which contains a plural noun phrase, can appear next to an "extraposed" relative that can only describe groups. Other squibs drew attention to particular theoretical assumptions. For instance, a squib by Bresnan in LI 1:2 ("A Grammatical Fiction") outlined an alternative account of the derivation of sentences containing believe and force, and asked whether there were principled reasons for dismissing any of the underlying assumptions (among them that semantic interpretation is sensitive to details of a syntactic derivation). A squib by Zwicky in LI 1:2 ("Class Complements in Phonology") asked to what extent phonological rules refer to complements of classes. None of these squibs was more than a couple of paragraphs; all of them limited themselves to a precise question or observation.
Snippets is an electronic journal. We will solicit submissions twice a year. The submissions that we accept will be posted on the journal website approximately 3 months after each deadline, and all accepted submissions will remain permanently on the website. Snippets is intended as a service to the linguistics community. Consequently, authors are advised that, when they submit to Snippets, we understand them as allowing their submission to be reproduced if published. At the same time, the rights for the published snippets themselves will remain with the authors. As a result, citation of Snippets material will have to indicate the author's name and the specific source of the material.
We will accept electronic submissions at the address firstname.lastname@example.org. Electronic submissions may take the form of (a) the text of an e-mail message, or (b) an attached file. The attached file should be a simple text file, a Word file (Mac or Windows), a Rich Text Format (RTF) file, or a PDF. The files must be anonymous, but must be accompanied with information about the authors: name, affiliation, and (postal or electronic) address. Submissions can be of any length below 500 words (including examples), with an additional half page allowed for diagrams, tables, and references. The submissions may not contain footnotes or general acknowledgments, except acknowledgements of funding sources, which must be credited in a line following the references. Authors who wish to acknowledge language consultants are allowed but not required to do so. We will not consider abstracts.
Submissions will be reviewed by our editorial board and review board, and review will be name-blind both ways. While we guarantee a response within 3 months of the submission deadline, we will not necessarily provide more than a yes/no response to the submitter. We allow resubmission (once) of the same piece.
The works included in Snippets are the property of their authors and are used by permission. Readers must apply the same principles of fair use to the works in this electronic archive that they would to a printed archive. These works may be read online, downloaded and printed for personal use, copied and freely distributed, or the URL of Snippets included in another electronic document. Any reference to material included in Snippets must cite the author and the source. The texts may not be published commercially (in print or electronic form), edited, or otherwise altered without the permission of the author.
visitors since 22nd June 2001