Email this article Praise as a Gift in the Relationship between Teachers and Their Students
Abstract
Abstract
The term “giving” refers to the altruistic act of offering something to another person for free without expecting anything in return. While prosocial behavior can also be found in very young children, altruistic behavior emerges later, with the moral and cognitive development, also supported by adult praise, that children may receive within the educational relationship. Education, in fact, has the noble purpose of guiding people to a better condition than they are now, through relationships. The aim of this paper is to review the works that have analyzed the effects of praise in the relationship between teacher and student. Experimental studies over the last 50 years have shown that praise is a low-cost strategy that teachers can use to increase adaptive behavior in the classroom and decrease problem behavior. Furthermore, the use of praise improves the classroom climate, as it is a vehicle for positive emotions. Modern neuroscience has now shown how emotions play an important role in learning, including school learning. Therefore, we could consider praise as one of the greatest gifts a teacher can give to their students.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFUsage metrics (updated daily, overnight Central European Time)
Article pageviews (filtered): 1059
PDF full-text accesses (filtered): 93
References
Apter, B., Sulla, F., & Swinson, J. (2020). A review of recent large-scale systematic UK classroom observations, method and findings, utility and impact. Educational Psychology in Practice, 36(4), 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2020.1802233.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36(2), 129.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.2.129
Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 5-32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1170249.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051001005
Caldarella, P., Larsen, R. A. A., Williams, L., Downs, K. R., Wills, H. P., & Wehby, J. H. (2020). Effects of teachers’ praise-to-reprimand ratios on elementary students’ on-task behavior. Educational Psychology, 40(10), 1306-1322. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1711872.
Caldarella, P., Larsen, R. A., Williams, L., & Wills, H. P. (2023). Effects of middle school teachers’ praise-to-reprimand ratios on students’ classroom behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 25(1), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007211035185.
Damasio, A. (1995). L’errore fondamentale di Cartesio. Emozione, ragione e cervello umano. Milano: Adelphi.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.) - N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3 (6th edn, pp. 646-718). New York: Wiley.
Fantinelli, S., Esposito, C., Carlucci, L., Limone, P., & Sulla, F. (2023). The influence of individual and contextual factors on the vocational choices of adolescents and their impact on well-being. Behavioral Sciences, 13(3), 233. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13030233.
Geake, J. G. (2016). Il cervello a scuola. Neuroscienze e educazione tra verità e falsi miti. Trento: Centro Studi Erickson.
Goleman, D. (1996). Intelligenza emotive. Che cos’è e perché può renderci felici. Milano: Rizzoli.
Henderlong, J., & Lepper, M. R. (2002). The effects of praise on children’s intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 774-795. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.774.
Indellicato, R. (2018). Ripensare l’educazione come dono. MeTis – Mondi educativi. Temi indagini suggestioni, 8(2), 517-533. doi: 10.30557/MT00043.
Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 835-847. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.35.3.835.
Lucangeli, D., Bonichini, S., & De Gennaro, M. A. (2019). Lo sviluppo cognitivo. Dalla cognition alla warm cognition. In D. Lucangeli & S. Vicari, Psicologia dello sviluppo. Milano: Mondadori.
Margalit, M. (2003). Resilience model among individuals with learning disabilities: Proximal and distal influences. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18(2), 82-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00062.
Mauss, M. (1950). Essai sur le don (Paris 1923-24); rééd. dans Sociologie et anthropologie. Paris: PUF, 1950.
Meccariello, A., & Mentasti, R. (2023). Le emozioni. Strumenti di apprendimento ed inclusione. Mizar. Costellazione di pensieri, 1(18), 163-173. doi: 10.1285/i24995835v2023n18p163.
Rose, D. H., & Strangman, N. (2007). Universal design for learning: Meeting the challenge of individual learning differences through a neurocognitive perspective. Universal Access in the Information Society, 5, 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0062-8.
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185-211. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG.
Sulla, F. (2022). Psicologia dell’educazione. Create (II ed.). Milano: McGraw Hill Education.
Sulla, F., Armenia, E., & Rollo, D. (2019). Natural rates of teachers’ approval and disapproval in Italian primary and secondary schools classroom. In G. Minati, M. Abram, & E. Pessa (Eds.), Systemics of incompleteness and quasi-systems (pp. 335-342). New York: Springer.
Sulla, F., Masi, A., Renati, R., Bonfiglio, S., & Rollo, D. (2020). A tool for the evaluation of hikikomori risk in Italian adolescents: A first contribution to its validation. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA), Bari, Italy, June 1 - July 1, 2020 (pp. 1-5). IEEE Press.
Sulla, F., Perini, S., & Rollo, D. (2013). Analisi funzionale dei comportamenti di approvazione e disapprovazione nelle interazioni insegnante-allievo. Una rassegna. Psicologia dell’educazione, 7(2), 193-216.
Sulla, F., & Rollo, D. (2023). The effect of a short course on a group of Italian primary school teachers’ rates of praise and their pupils’ on-task behaviour. Education Sciences, 13(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010078.
Swinson, J., & Harrop, A. (2005). An examination of the effects of a short course aimed at enabling teachers in infant, junior and secondary schools to alter the verbal feedback given to their pupils. Educational Studies, 31(2), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690500095316.
Treccani (2022). Vocabolario della lingua italiana. Roma: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Treccani.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/elementa-2023-0102-lasu
Copyright (©) 2023 Andreana Lavanga, Francesco Sulla – Editorial format and Graphical layout: copyright (©) LED Edizioni Universitarie
This work is published on this website under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Announcement
New Series: Filosofie e Storie delle Filosofie. Philosophies and Histories of Philosophies
Forthcoming Vol 24-25 (2024-2025) n.s. “Le tradizioni della filosofia" - "The traditions of philosophy"
Elementa. Intersezioni tra filosofia, epistemologia e prospettive empiriche
Registered by Tribunale di Milano 2361/2021 (29/12/2021) - RG n. 16898/2021
Electronic edition ISSN 2785-4426 - Print edition ISSN 2785-4558
Editor-in-Chief: Paolo Ponzio
Editorial Board: Oscar Barroso - Alessandra Beccarisi - Marcela Lisseth Brito de Butter - Clementina Cantillo - Vincent Carraud - Antonio Clericuzio - Jean-Paul De Lucca - Ricardo Espinoza Lolas - Costantino Esposito - Jose Maria Esquirol - Marco Forlivesi - Christoff Helmig - Francesco Marrone (Co-chief editor) - Maurizio Martirano - Maria Lida Mollo - Alejandro Mumbrú Mora - Gilles Olivo - Carla Rita Palmerino - Pasquale Porro - Benedetta Saponaro - Luca Maria Scarantino - Tommaso Sgarro (Co-chief editor) - Jacob Schmutz - Stella Villarmea.
Editorial Staff: Savino Carbone - Maria Anna Misuriello - Giulio Navarra - Vanessa Riela - Riccardo Roni - Anna Daniela Savino.
© 2001-2026 LED Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto