Email this article Distributive Justice and Animal Welfare
Abstract
Besides the focus on the various approaches developed until now within animal ethics, perhaps it would be interesting to consider also what ethical theories have ruled out any moral concern for the interests of non-human beings. This article aims to rise some questions about the exclusion of (sentient) animals in the philosophical debates on distributive justice. The introduction briefly provides an overview on the current debate on distributive justice. The author focuses on those theories that adopt welfare as the currency of distribution (so-called “welfare ethics”), underlining how there seem to be a contradiction between the theory of value they rely on and their approach, exclusively focused on humans. The essay analyses the main issues related to the inclusion of animals in welfare ethics, i.e. (a) the alleged incommensurability between human and animal welfare, and (b) the “problematic conclusion”. The paper sketches a hypothesis of research to solve the “inter-species wellbeing comparisons” issue by proposing a model based on species-typical potentialities. Then, it tries to address the problem of demandingness by suggesting a sympathy-based foundation of welfare ethics. The last section singles out the moral issue of laboratory animals as an appropriate field of application for a welfarist approach.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adler, Matthew D. 2012. Well-Being and Fair Distribution: Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195384994.001.0001
Adler, Matthew D. 2019. Measuring Social Welfare: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190643027.001.0001
Ahlhaus, Svenja, and Peter Niesen. 2015. "What Is Animal Politics? Out-line of a New Research Agenda". Historical Social Research 40: 7-31.
Appleby, Michael C., and Peter Sandøe. 2002. "Philosophical Debate on the Nature of Well-Being: Implications for Animal Welfare". Ani-mal Welfare 11: 283-294.
Arneson, Richard J. 1999. "What, If Anything, Renders All Humans Equal?". In Singer and His Critics, edited by Dale Jamieson, 103-128. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bentham, Jeremy. 2000. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Kitchener: Batoche Books.
Brandt, Richard B. 1979. A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Broome, John. 1991. Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cochrane, Alasdair. 2010. An Introduction to Animals and Political Theory. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230290594
Crisp, Roger. 2003. "Equality, Priority, and Compassion". Ethics 113: 745-763.
https://doi.org/10.1086/373954
Donaldson, Sue, and Will Kymlicka. 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1981. "What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources". Philosophy & Public Affairs 10: 283-345.
Frankfurt, Harry. 1987. "Equality as a Moral Ideal". Ethics 98: 21-43.
https://doi.org/10.1086/292913
Harsanyi, John C. 1955. "Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics and In-terpersonal Comparisons of Utility". Journal of Political Economy 63: 309-321.
https://doi.org/10.1086/257678
Holtug, Nils. 2007. "Animals: Equality for Animals". In New Waves in Applied Ethics, edited by Jesper Ryberg, Thomas S. Petersen, and Clark Wolf, 1-24. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Holtug, Nils. 2010. Persons, Interests, and Justice. Oxford: Oxford Univer-sity Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580170.001.0001
Jonas, Hans. 2009. Il principio di responsabilità. Torino. Einaudi.
Lumer, Christoph. 2005. Prioritarian Welfare Functions: An Elaboration and Justification. Working Paper University of Siena, Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences. 43 pp. http://www.lumer.info/wpcontent/uploads/2020/07/A066_Lumer_PrioritarianWelfareFunctions.pdf
Lumer, Christoph. 2008. "Priorità per chi sta peggio. Valori e norme morali nel prioritarismo etico". In Etica normativa - Principi dell'agire morale, a cura di Christoph Lumer, 93-116. Roma: Carocci.
Lumer, Christoph. 2021a. "From Utilitarianism to Prioritarianism: an Empathy-Based Internalist Foundation of Welfare Ethics". In Util-ity, Progress, Tecnology, edited by Michael Schefczyk and Christoph Schmidt-Petri, 139-151. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.
Lumer, Christoph. 2021b. "How to Define 'Prioritarianism' and Distinguish It From (Moderate) Egalitarianism". In Utility, Progress, Tecnology, edited by Michael Schefczyk and Christoph Schmidt-Petri, 153-166. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.
McKerlie, Dennis. 2007. "Egalitarianism and the Difference Between Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Judgments". In New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality, edited by Nils Holtug and Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, 157-173. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2008.00016.x
McMahan, Jeff. 2002. The Ethics of Killing: Problems at the Margins of Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/0195079981.003.0003
Mill, John S. 2002. "Utilitarianism". In The Basic Writing of John Stuart Mill: On Liberty, The Subjection of Women, and Utilitarianism, Introduction by Jerome B. Schneewind, Notes and Commentary by Dale E. Miller. New York: The Modern Library.
Nagel, Thomas. 1979. "Equality". In Mortal Questions, 106-127. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107341050.010
Nagel, Thomas. 1991. Equality and Partiality. New York - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2007. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Har-vard University Press.
https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c7zftw
Olsson, I. Anna S., Paul Robinson, and Peter Sandøe. 2011. "Ethics of Animal Research". In Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science: Essential Principles and Practises, I, edited by Jann Hau and Steven J. Schapiro, 21-37. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press.
https://doi.org/10.1201/b10416-3
Otsuka, Michael, and Alex Voorhoeve. 2009. "Why It Matters That Some Are Worse-Off than Others: An Argument against the Priority View". Philosophy and Public Affairs 37: 171-199.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01154.x
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Parfit, Derek. 1997. "Equality and Priority". Ratio 10: 202-221.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9329.00041
Parfit, Derek. 2012. "Another Defence of the Priority View". Utilitas 24: 399-440.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S095382081200009X
Person, Ingmar. 1984. "A Basis for (Interspecies) Equality". In The Great Ape Project, edited by Paola Cavalieri and Peter Singer. London: Routledge.
Porter, David G. 1992. "Ethical Scores for Animal Experiments". Nature 356: 101-102.
https://doi.org/10.1038/356101a0
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042582
Regan, Tom. 1983. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sandøe, Peter, Sandra A. Corr, T.B. Lund, and B. Frogman. 2019. "Ag-gregating Animal Welfare Indicators: Can It Be Done in a Transparent and Ethically Robust Way?". Animal Welfare 28: 67-76.
https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.28.1.067
Sandøe, Peter, Roger Crisp, and Nils Holtug. 1997. "Ethics: Chapter 1". In Animal Welfare, edited by Michael C. Appleby and Barry O. Hughes, 3-17. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
Sen, Amartya. 1980. "Equality of What?". In The Tanner Lectures on Hu-man Values, I, edited by Sterling McMurrin, 353-369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 1995. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/0198289286.001.0001
Sidgwick, Henry. 1962. The Methods of Ethics. London: Palgrave Macmil-lan.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-81786-3
Singer, Peter. 2002. Animal Liberation. New York: Harper Collins.
Singer, Peter 2011. Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stafleu, F.R., R. Tramper, J. Vorstenbosch, and J.A. Joles. 1999. "The Eth-ical Acceptability of Animal Experiments: A Proposal for a System to Support Decision-Making". Laboratory Animals 33: 295-303.
https://doi.org/10.1258/002367799780578255
Taylor, Paul W. 1986. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Eth-ics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Temkin, Larry S. 1993. Inequality. New York - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vallentyne, Peter. 2007. "Of Mice and Men, Equality and Animals". In New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality, edited by Nils Holtug and Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, 211-237. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Varner, Gary. 2011. "Biocentric Individualism". In Environmental Ethics: What Really Matters, What Really Works, 2nd ed., edited by David Schmidtz and Elizabeth Willott, 90-101. New York: Oxford University Press.
Veissier, I., K.K. Jensen, R. Botreau, and P. Sandøe. 2011. "Highlighting Ethical Decisions Underlying the Scoring of Animal Welfare in the Welfare Quality® Scheme". Animal Welfare 20: 89-101.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/rela-2021-0102-morr
Copyright (©) 2022 Paola Morreale – Editorial format and Graphical layout: copyright (©) LED Edizioni Universitarie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism
Registered by Tribunale di Milano (04/05/2012 n. 211)
Online ISSN 2280-9643 - Print ISSN 2283-3196
Executive Editor: Francesco Allegri
Associate Editor: Matteo Andreozzi
Review Editors: Sofia Bonicalzi - Eleonora Adorni
Editorial Board: Ralph R. Acampora - Carol J. Adams - Vilma Baricalla - Luisella Battaglia - Rod Bennison - Matthew R. Calarco - Piergiorgio Donatelli - William Grove-Fanning - Serenella Iovino - Luigi Lombardi Vallauri - Christoph Lumer - Joel MacClellan - Dario Martinelli - Roberto Marchesini - Alma Massaro - Serpil Oppermann - Simone Pollo - Paola Sobbrio - Kim Stallwood - Sabrina Tonutti - Jessica Ullrich - Federico Zuolo
Referee List
© 2001 LED Edizioni Universitarie di Lettere Economia Diritto